You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 2, February 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Perioperative Complications, Comorbidities, and Survival in Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer

Karina de Cássia Braga Ribeiro, DDS, PhD; Luiz Paulo Kowalski, MD, PhD; Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:219-228.

Objectives  To establish the value of clinical factors in the prediction of perioperative complications and death in patients with oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas and to develop a new extended clinical severity staging system that combines patient and tumor factors.

Patients and Methods  A total of 530 patients with oral or oropharyngeal carcinomas submitted to surgical treatment were studied. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for perioperative complications, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to establish independent prognostic factors.

Results  Daily alcohol consumption, smoking, sex, neck lump, earache, pain, dysphagia, weight loss, oral bleeding, odynophagia, body mass index, National Cancer Institute comorbidity index score, American Society of Anesthesiologists surgical risk, hematocrit level, and total lymphocyte count had an impact on prognosis in univariate analysis. Survival according to extended clinical severity stage was 76.7% for stage 1, 64.4% for stage 2, 44.8% for stage 3, and 25.5% for stage 4 ({chi}2 = 64.16; P<.001). In multivariate analysis, only APACHE II score, neck dissection, POSSUM index score, and type of reconstruction were independent risk factors for perioperative complications. The final prognostic model included development of local plus systemic complications, extended clinical severity stage, type of reconstruction, and APACHE II score.

Conclusions  Clinical variables have a predictive effect on morbidity and mortality of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated surgically. Local plus systemic perioperative complications can adversely affect the prognosis. The uniformity of results confirms that survival estimates can be enhanced by the addition of clinical characteristics to the TNM classification, creating a more accurate system for the estimation of prognosis.


From the Hospital Cancer Registry (Dr Ribeiro) and the Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology (Dr Kowalski), Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo, and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo (Dr Latorre), São Paulo, Brazil.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validation of the Washington University Head and Neck Comorbidity Index in a Cohort of Older Patients
Sanabria et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:603-607.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comorbidity Is a Prognostic Factor in Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Sanabria et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1449-1457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.