You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 2, February 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Use of the Operating Microscope and Loupes for Head and Neck Free Microvascular Tissue Transfer

A Retrospective Comparison

Douglas A. Ross, MD; Stephan Ariyan, MD, MBA; Richard Restifo, MD; Clarence T. Sasaki, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:189-193.

Objective  To analyze whether less cumbersome loupes are as equally efficacious as the microscope for magnification for free tissue transfers in head and neck reconstruction.

Design  A 7-year retrospective review of 151 consecutive microvascular free tissue transfers compares the operating microscope with loupe magnification.

Setting  A tertiary care medical center.

Patients  A total of 151 consecutive patients undergoing microvascular reconstructions.

Intervention  Microvascular reconstruction of ablative head and neck cancer defects using either microscopic or loupe-provided magnification.

Main Outcome Measures  Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, preoperative radiation status, type of defect and flap, length of procedure, complications, and length of stay.

Results  Two teams shared the reconstructions, with all microvascular anastomoses created or directly supervised by one of us (D.A.R.). One team used the operating microscope for magnification (84 cases), while the other used loupes (67 cases). Complication rates were statistically similar for the 2 techniques, the length of procedure tended to be shorter in the loupe group, and the length of stay was statistically similar in both groups.

Conclusions  A review of the literature validates the usefulness of loupe magnification in free tissue transfer surgery. To our knowledge, this is the largest number of head and neck reconstruction cases presented comparing these techniques. Loupes offer the surgeon comfort and easy access to and uncomplicated visualization of the operating field. Furthermore, loupes may decrease operating time and help avoid complicated equipment. Therefore, loupe magnification should be considered in head and neck reconstruction without the fear of increased morbidity.


From the Sections of Otolaryngology (Drs Ross and Sasaki) and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Drs Ariyan and Restifo), Yale University School of Medicine, and Yale–New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, Conn.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Arterial Coupling for Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Head and Neck Reconstruction
Ross et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:891-895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.