This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (21)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Balance Disorders  • Alert me on articles by topic

Charles C. Della Santina, PhD, MD; Phillip D. Cremer, MBBS, PhD; John P. Carey, MD; Lloyd B. Minor, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1044-1054.

Objectives  To compare 2 clinical tests of vestibular function, the head autorotation test (HART) and the head thrust test (HTT), and to determine why they give disparate results in patients with known unilateral vestibular deficiency (UVD) due to labyrinthectomy.

Methods  We used scleral coils to measure the horizontal (yaw) vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in 5 healthy human subjects and in 11 patients who underwent labyrinthectomy. We used 2 paradigms. Using HART, subjects visually fixated a target during self-generated, swept-frequency, sinusoidal, horizontal head rotations. Using HTT, patients fixated the target during horizontal head thrusts delivered randomly in direction and time.

Results  In subjects without UVD, eye movements were almost perfectly compensatory for both paradigms. In subjects with UVD, VOR gain for ipsilesional head thrusts was low for both paradigms, but significantly (P<.001) higher (less abnormal) for HART (0.60 ± 0.13) than for HTT (0.14 ± 0.13). Contralesional gain was reduced for both, to 0.64 ± 0.20 for HART and to 0.57 ± 0.17 for HTT. Because ipsilesional and contralesional gains were not statistically different for HART (P = .69), comparison of VOR gains for half-cycle responses to the HART stimulus could not reliably identify the side of the known lesion. In contrast, HTT consistently identified the side of the lesion for all subjects with UVD. To investigate whether preprogramming contributes to the boost in VOR as measured by HART, we compared the gain and response delay of eye movements during actively self-generated and passively received head thrusts. For subjects without UVD, response delays were shorter for active (6 ± 1 milliseconds) than for passive (12 ± 1 milliseconds) HTT. For ipsilesional rotations of subjects with UVD, active HTT yielded a significantly higher gain (0.44 ± 0.20) (P<.001) and a shorter delay (15 ± 6 milliseconds) (P<.001) than did passive HTT (0.14 ± 0.13 and 37 ± 15 milliseconds, respectively). Contralesional test results revealed a similar performance boost for active head movements. Data are given as mean ± SD.

Conclusion  When comparison of half-cycle gains is used to identify the lesion side, self-generated predictable head movement paradigms, such as HART and active HTT, are less accurate than passive HTT in the characterization of UVD, in part because preprogramming can augment the VOR during voluntary head movements.

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (Drs Della Santina, Carey, and Minor); and the Eye and Ear Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia (Dr Cremer).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Asymmetric Recovery in Cerebellar-Deficient Mice Following Unilateral Labyrinthectomy
Beraneck et al.
J. Neurophysiol. 2008;100:945-958.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery of Dynamic Visual Acuity in Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Herdman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:383-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Corrigenda
J. Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1820-1821.
FULL TEXT  

The Active Head-Impulse Test in Unilateral Peripheral Vestibulopathy
Black et al.
Arch Neurol 2005;62:290-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Signal Processing in the Vestibular System During Active Versus Passive Head Movements
Cullen and Roy
J. Neurophysiol. 2004;91:1919-1933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimizing the Sensitivity of the Head Thrust Test for Identifying Vestibular Hypofunction
Schubert et al.
ptjournal 2004;84:151-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cerebellar ataxia with bilateral vestibulopathy: description of a syndrome and its characteristic clinical sign
Migliaccio et al.
Brain 2004;127:280-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery of Dynamic Visual Acuity in Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Herdman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:819-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT