You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 9, September 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cochlear Implantation
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cochlear Implantation in Children With CHARGE Association

Paul W. Bauer, MD; Franz J. Wippold II, MD; Jenifer Goldin, MS, CCC-A; Rodney P. Lusk, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1013-1017.

Objective  To explore the anomalies of the temporal bone found on radiologic examination, technical challenges in cochlear implantation, and audiologic benefit derived from cochlear implantation in a series of children with CHARGE association.

Design  Case series report.

Setting  Tertiary referral children's hospital pediatric cochlear implant program.

Patients  Six children with CHARGE association and sensorineural hearing loss.

Intervention  All patients were evaluated and followed up by the cochlear implant team. Cochlear implantation was attempted in all 6 children.

Main Outcome Measures  Computed tomographic scans and cochlear implantation operative records were reviewed, and their findings were correlated. Audiometric and speech perception data before and after cochlear implantation were compared.

Results  Five children with CHARGE association received implants. A sixth child did not because of an aberrant course to the facial nerve. The 5 children receiving implants obtained varying degrees of measurable benefit from their implants. All 6 children had temporal bone abnormalities seen on their computed tomographic scans and documented at the time of surgery.

Conclusions  Variations in the temporal bone anatomy of patients with CHARGE association can lead to increased technical challenges and risk to the facial nerve during cochlear implantation. Individual outcomes after implantation may vary; our patients receiving implants obtained benefit. Parents should be counseled thoroughly and have appropriate expectations before proceeding with implantation.


From Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine (Drs Bauer and Lusk); the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology (Drs Bauer and Lusk), Departments of Radiology (Dr Wippold) and Audiology (Cochlear Implant Program) (Ms Goldin), St Louis Children's Hospital; and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center (Dr Wippold), St Louis, Mo; and F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (Dr Wippold). Dr Bauer is now with the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

SLC26A4/PDS genotype-phenotype correlation in hearing loss with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA): evidence that Pendred syndrome and non-syndromic EVA are distinct clinical and genetic entities
Pryor et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2005;42:159-165.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.