This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Head & Neck Cancer  • Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Quality of Care, Other  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ara A. Chalian, MD; Sarah H. Kagan, PhD, RN; Andrew N. Goldberg, MD; Allan Gottschalk, MD, PhD; Ann Dakunchak, BSN, RN; Gregory S. Weinstein, MD; Randal S. Weber, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:892-896.

Objectives  To describe the design and impact of 3 intraoperative pathways for the treatment of head and neck cancers; to detail the pathways schematically to illustrate projected intraoperative flow and teamwork; and to analyze impact on procedure and case lengths in each pathway and in comparison with historical prepathway average times.

Setting  Tertiary-level academic health system main operating room.

Patients  Twenty-one patients undergoing transcervical (TC) resection (n = 11), transmandibular (TM) resection (n = 8), or laryngopharyngectomy (LP) (n = 2) with radial forearm free-flap reconstruction for ablative or reconstructive reasons were pathway eligible. A convenience sample of 16 patients undergoing TC resection, 7 undergoing TM resection, and 7 undergoing LP prepathway is used for comparison.

Intervention  Our academic medical center uses 3 intraoperative clinical pathways to manage resource use and streamline care for patients. These 3 pathways were designed schematically by an interdisciplinary team. The pathways plan progression of the case by timed actions for surgical, anesthesia, and nursing teams.

Main Outcome Measures  Procedure and case lengths.

Results  The TC pathway procedure and case length averaged 10.48 and 12.33 hours, respectively; TM pathway procedure and case lengths, 11.19 and 13.32 hours, respectively; and LP pathway procedure and case lengths, 12.42 and 13.83 hours, respectively. Aggregate averages were 10.93 hours and 12.85 hours for procedure and case length, respectively. The average pathway case lengths of 12.33, 13.32, and 13.83 hours compare favorably with our target times of 13, 14, and 15 hours, respectively. Environmental management, work flow, and team satisfaction anecdotally increased postpathway.

Conclusions  Intraoperative pathways afford enhanced time and action efficiency to streamline care of patients undergoing head and neck procedures. Pathway implementation produced time savings. Our results suggest that implementation of such pathways will benefit similar academic medical centers seeking to improve intraoperative resource use to improve performance in the care of patients undergoing head and neck procedures.

From the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Chalian, Goldberg, Weinstein, and Weber) and Anesthesia (Dr Gottschalk), and the Nursing Service, School of Nursing (Dr Kagan and Ms Dakunchak), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Dr Goldberg is now with the Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and Dr Gottschalk is now with the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Operating-Room Throughput: Strategies for Improvement
Saleh et al.
JBJS 2009;91:2028-2039.
FULL TEXT