You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 7, July 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Sleep Apnea
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Validation of the Snore Outcomes Survey for Patients With Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Richard E. Gliklich, MD; Pa-Chun Wang, MD, MSc

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:819-824.

Objective  To develop and validate a self-reported outcomes measure for patients with sleep-disordered breathing—the Snore Outcomes Survey.

Design  Item areas of the SOS were developed by an expert panel. Consecutive patients were enrolled into the study in a prospective manner. Patients received the SOS, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and standard overnight polysomnography at baseline and after 4 months of continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Setting  A tertiary care, academic otolaryngology and sleep disorders referral center.

Patients  One hundred fifty-six adult patients presenting with a chief complaint of snoring or sleep-disordered breathing to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston.

Main Outcome Measures  Test-retest reliability, intrasurvey reliability, internal consistency, validity, and standardized response means of the SOS.

Results  Overall, reliability of the SOS was excellent (test-retest reliability r = 0.86; P<.001; Cronbach {alpha} coefficient, 0.85). The SOS index significantly correlated with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (r = - 0.42; P<.001) and the global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score (r = - 0.38; P<.001), as well as with the number of recorded arterial oxygen saturation levels below 85% (r = - 0.46; P = .02). The SOS index was sensitive to clinical changes after intervention (standardized response mean, 0.57).

Conclusion  The SOS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing sleep-related health status for patients with snoring and sleep-disordered breathing and for measuring change in health status following therapy.


From the Department of Otolaryngology and the Clinical Outcomes Research Unit, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and the Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Dr Wang is now with the Department of Otolaryngology, Cathay General Hospital, and the Department of Public Health, China Medical College, Taiwan.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improvement in Quality of Life After Nasal Surgery Alone for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Nasal Obstruction
Li et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:429-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A thermoplastic mandibular advancement device for the management of non-apnoeic snoring: a randomized controlled trial
Cooke and Battagel
Eur J Orthod 2006;28:327-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Quality of Life and Respiratory Disturbance After Extended Uvulopalatal Flap Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Li et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:195-200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.