You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Three-dimensional Imaging of the Inner Ear by Volume-Rendered Reconstructions of Magnetic Resonance Data

Randolf Klingebiel, MD; Nadine Thieme, MD; Dietmar Kivelitz, MD; Christian Enzweiler, MD; Mechthild Werbs, MD; Rüdiger Lehmann, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:549-553.

Objective  To evaluate 3-dimensional inner ear visualization by volume rendering of high-resolution magnetic resonance data in patients with clinically suspected inner ear abnormality.

Design  Prospective comparative study of different postprocessing techniques, based on blinded film readings.

Setting  Tertiary referral hospital.

Subjects  Fifty patients (17 females and 33 males) aged 1 to 77 years (average age, 42 years) with sensorineural hearing loss, vertigo, and/or tinnitus.

Intervention  Postprocessing of magnetic resonance data to inner ear reconstructions by the use of volume rendering as well as maximum-intensity projection; caloric testing by electronystagmography.

Main Outcome Measures  Film was read blindly by 4 radiologists using a 5-point parameter scale for image quality and diagnostic value. The assessibility of inner ear subsegments was evaluated. The specificity of volume-rendered reconstructions for detecting semicircular canal obliterations was assessed in a subgroup of 9 patients by caloric testing. The time required for data postprocessing as well as film reading was recorded by means of a stopwatch.

Results  Volume-rendered inner ear reconstructions were superior in image quality (P<.001), diagnostic value (P<.001), subsegment inner ear assessment (P<.01 to P<.001), and film reading time (P<.001) compared with maximum-intensity projections. The data postprocessing time was comparable for both techniques. Caloric weakness was noted in all patients assessed by electronystagmography.

Conclusion  Volume rendering is the postprocessing technique of choice for 3-dimensional inner ear visualization, performing better than maximum-intensity projections with respect to various parameters.


From the Neuroradiology Section (Drs Klingebiel, Thieme, and Lehmann), Department of Radiology (Dr Kivelitz), and Ear, Nose, and Throat Department (Dr Werbs), Charité Campus Mitte, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany; and the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Enzweiler).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(5):608-610.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.