You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hearing Loss/ Deafness
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Noise Exposure in the Presence of Canal Fenestration on the Amplitude of Short-Latency Vestibular Evoked Potentials

Adi Biron, MD; Sharon Freeman, PhD; Jean-Yves Sichel, MD; Haim Sohmer, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:544-548.

Background  Exposure to high-intensity noise causes little, if any, reduction in vestibular function in normal animals as shown by short-latency vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs).

Objective  To investigate the effect of noise exposure on VsEPs following fenestration of the horizontal semicircular canal.

Design and Methods  Psammomys obesus (fat sand rat) underwent labyrinthectomy in 1 ear, while the lateral semicircular canal in the other ear was fenestrated. Control VsEPs to linear acceleration (approximately 3g; rise time, approximately 1-2 milliseconds) were recorded immediately after the operation. The experimental group animals were then subjected to loud white noise (113-dB sound pressure level) for 1 hour. Immediately after the noise exposure in the experimental group animals, VsEPs were once more recorded.

Results  The VsEPs in the experimental group animals were significantly reduced immediately following the noise exposure, while there was no change in the recordings from the control group animals (fenestrated but not noise exposed; noise exposed but not fenestrated), even though the noise exposure induced a mean 47-dB threshold elevation of the auditory brainstem response.

Conclusions  The presence of the fenestration caused the vestibular end organs to become vulnerable to noise exposure. The fenestration may create a pathway enabling pressure release through the vestibular end organs during noise exposure, thus increasing the possibility of damage to the vestibular end organs. This did not occur in the intact, nonfenestrated animals.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (Drs Biron and Sichel) and Physiology (Drs Freeman and Sohmer), Hebrew University–Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(5):608-610.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.