This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Head & Neck Cancer  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Alert me on articles by topic

Diego A. Preciado, MD; Leslie A. Sebring, MD, PhD; George L. Adams, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:539-543.

Background  Spinal metastases are uncommon in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Treatment strategies in this patient group have not been defined. Although it has been established that neurologic dysfunction in patients with spinal metastases and cord compression constitutes an oncologic emergency, the role of surgical treatment remains controversial.

Objective  To clarify the treatment options in patients with head and neck cancer who develop spinal metastases.

Methods  The clinical course of patients seen at our institution with head and neck neoplasms and spinal metastases from January 1992 to January 2000 was reviewed.

Results  Eleven patients were identified. Nine developed spinal metastases more than 3 months after the diagnosis of advanced head and neck cancer. The other 2 presented with synchronous spinal involvement and skull base neoplasms. Patients without neurologic symptoms were offered intravenous steroids and palliative radiation. Patients with neurologic symptoms were treated with either intravenous steroids and radiation or surgical decompression and spinal fusion. In 1 patient, no improvement occurred within the first 2 days of radiotherapy, and the patient underwent surgical decompression. Patients with an unstable spine underwent surgical decompression and spinal fusion. Patients with a life expectancy of more than 6 months and neurologic symptoms were offered surgical therapy. In the 9 patients with advanced cancer, the average survival time was 3 months. Two of these patients have survived longer than 6 months.

Conclusions  We propose that surgical decompression is a viable, justifiable option for selected patients with advanced head and neck cancer and spinal cord compression. Furthermore, we recommend surgical decompression as a first option in patients with an unstable bony spine and/or in whom survival is expected to be longer than 6 months. Finally, we propose a patient management algorithm in these cases.

From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Preciado and Adams) and Neurosurgery (Dr Sebring), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Detection of Occult Bone Metastases From Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography With Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18
Basu et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:801-805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoradionecrosis mimicking metastatic epidural spinal cord compression
Mut et al.
Neurology 2005;64:396-397.
FULL TEXT  

Residual or recurrent head and neck cancer presenting with nerve root compression affecting the upper limbs
Mendes et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2004;77:688-690.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT