You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Pathology of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Markers for Nodal Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

Robert P. Takes, MD, PhD; Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong, MD, PhD; Martijn J. R. C. Alles, MD; Cees A. Meeuwis, MD, PhD; Henri A. M. Marres, MD, PhD; Paul P. M. Knegt, MD, PhD; Guy Brutel de la Riviere, MD, PhD; Peter C. M. de Wilde, MD, PhD; Wolter J. Mooi, MD, PhD; Jo Hermans, PhD; J. Han J. M. van Krieken, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:512-518.

Objective  To identify markers that are relevant as predictors of lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Design  Expression of p53, Rb, cyclin D1, E-cadherin, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule was examined using immunohistochemical analysis and traditional histological parameters, and the correlation of these markers with the histologically verified presence of regional metastases was determined.

Subjects  The study sample comprised 121 patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer from whom paraffin-embedded material of primary tumors was used.

Results  Lymph node metastasis was correlated with the loss of expression of Rb (P = .04) and marginally correlated with the loss of expression of E-cadherin (P = .06). If the results are broken down to subsites, loss of E-cadherin expression in oral cancer (P = .04) and absence of eosinophilic infiltration in laryngeal cancer (P = .003) correlated with nodal metastasis. None of the other markers correlated. A combination of relevant parameters did not result in a much stronger correlation.

Conclusions  The expression of the investigated genetic markers and histopathological features of primary tumors can supply limited information on the metastatic behavior of tumors. Although the use of markers for regional metastasis would be a welcome additional tool, these results do not warrant the use of these parameters for clinical decision making concerning the treatment of the neck in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Leiden (Drs Takes, Baatenburg de Jong, and Alles), Daniël den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam (Dr Meeuwis), University Hospital, Nijmegen (Dr Marres), and University Hospital, Rotterdam (Dr Knegt), the Netherlands; the Departments of Pathology, Daniël den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam (Dr de la Riviere), University Hospital, Nijmegen (Dr de Wilde), and University Hospital, Rotterdam (Dr Mooi), and University Hospital, Leiden (Dr van Krieken); and the Department of Medical Statistics, University of Leiden (Dr Hermans).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(5):608-610.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Correlation of Clinical, Histological, and Cytokeratin Profiles of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue With Prognosis
Dantas da Silveira et al.
INT J SURG PATHOL 2007;15:376-383.
ABSTRACT  

Prognostic value of activated Akt expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Lim et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2005;58:1199-1205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies
Kyzas et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1043-1055.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.