 |
 |

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanomas
Snehal G. Patel, MD;
Daniel G. Coit, MD;
Ashok R. Shaha, MD;
Mary Sue Brady, MD;
Jay O. Boyle, MD;
Bhuvanesh Singh, MD;
Jatin P. Shah, MD;
Dennis H. Kraus, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:285-291.
Objective To report the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cutaneous
head and neck melanomas (CMHNs).
Design Consecutive series followed for a median of 20 months.
Setting Tertiary cancer care center.
Patients Fifty-six individuals with clinically node-negative CMHN, median Breslow
thickness, 2.6 mm (range, 0.2-20.0 mm).
Interventions Preoperative technetium 99m sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy (PLSG)
followed within 4 hours by intraoperative handheld gamma probe localization
(IHGP). Intraoperative injection of 1% isosulfan blue dye (IBD) was used in
48 patients. Immediate completion nodal dissection was performed for metastatic
SLNs on intraoperative frozen section analysis and monitoring for negative
SLNs.
Main Outcome Measures Rate of SLN identification, SLN and non-SLN positivity, same-basin recurrence,
and disease-specific and recurrence-free survival.
Results Combination of IHGP and IBD improved SLN identification to 96% from
93% for IHGP and 73% for IBD alone. Four patients had a positive SLN on frozen
section analysis. A negative SLNB correctly predicted regional nodal control
in 47 of 48 patients but missed 1 of 5 patients who had regional lymphatic
disease. All 4 patients who failed SLNB remain alive and free of recurrent
disease. Two-year Kaplan-Meier disease-specific and relapse-free survival
was 91% and 88%, respectively. Two-year disease-specific survival was 93%
for SLN-negative patients and 50% for SLN-positive patients (P=
.20).
Conclusions Combining PLSG with IHGP and IBD improves the success rate of SLNB.
Although SLNB is a reliable indicator of the status of the draining lymphatic
basins in CMHN, patients with negative SLNs must be observed for longer periods
to understand the true implications of the procedure.
From the Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, NY.
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(3):332-334.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Incidence and Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma Involving the Head and Neck
Bradford and Levine
JAMA 2007;297:2628-2629.
FULL TEXT
Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients.
Leong et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:370-373.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patterns of Drainage and Recurrence Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck
Fincher et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:844-848.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Cutaneous Desmoplastic Melanoma
Gyorki et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2003;10:403-407.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Melanomas
Chao et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2003;10:21-26.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reliability of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping With Biopsy for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma
Schmalbach et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:61-65.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|