This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Neal D. Futran, MD, DMD; Jeffrey Trad Wadsworth, MD; Douglas Villaret, MD; D. Gregory Farwell, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:161-166.

Objective  To evaluate the use, indications, and outcomes of the fibula osteocutaneous free flap when reconstructing the midface.

Design  Retrospective review of a case series.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  We evaluated all patients requiring midface reconstruction after tumor resection between January 1, 1994, and January 1, 2000. Twenty-seven individuals who lacked sufficient retentive surfaces and/or teeth to support a conventional prosthesis were offered vascularized bony reconstruction.

Interventions  All patients underwent fibular osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the midface: 16 primarily, 11 secondarily.

Main Outcome Measures  Success of free tissue transfer, perioperative complications, oral diet, speech, type of dental reconstruction, and cosmesis.

Results  Twenty-six of 27 flaps survived. Four patients had wound complications managed successfully with local wound care. Fourteen patients achieved a regular diet and 13 patients maintain a soft diet. Eighteen patients had osseointegrated implants placed, and 14 patients used an implant-borne prosthesis. Cosmetic results were judged to be excellent in 14 patients; good in 8; fair in 4; and poor in 1.

Conclusions  Use of the fibula osteocutaneous free flap to reconstruct the midface is highly reliable and our flap of choice for lower maxillary defects requiring bony reconstruction. However, when orbitozygomatic support is the primary objective, the utility of this flap is limited. Because of the complexity of this procedure, the choice of midface reconstruction technique should be individualized for each patient.

From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Drs Futran, Wadsworth, and Farwell), and at the University of Florida, Gainesville (Dr Villaret).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(2):202-203.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Precontoured Positioning Plates and Pericranial Flaps in Midfacial Reconstruction to Optimize Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes
Ducic and Oxford
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:387-392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osseocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Tissue Transfer for Repair of Complex Midfacial Defects
Chepeha et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:513-517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT