You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 10, October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quality-of-Life Assessment After Supradose Selective Intra-arterial Cisplatin and Concomitant Radiation (RADPLAT) for Inoperable Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Annemieke H. Ackerstaff, PhD; I. Bing Tan, MD, PhD; Coen R. N. Rasch, MD, PhD; Alfons J. M. Balm, MD, PhD; Ronald B. Keus, MD; Jan H. Schornagel, MD, PhD; Frans J. M. Hilgers, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1185-1190.

Objective  To evaluate quality-of-life (QOL) aspects of an organ preservation intra-arterial chemotherapy and concomitant radiation protocol, RADPLAT.

Design  Nonrandomized phase 2B feasibility trial.

Patients  Fifty consecutive patients with inoperable stage IV head and neck cancer.

Intervention  Supradose selective intra-arterial cisplatin and concomitant standard radiation (RADPLAT).

Measures  Assessment with structured questionnaires before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results  Twenty-six patients were available for QOL assessment at 1 year (the "1-year QOL" group), as 16 patients died, 5 needed salvage surgery, and 3 were not available for interview (the "failure" group). Twelve-month results were mainly based on the first group. The functional well-being and head and neck scales showed a statistically significant improvement over time (P<.001). After 12 months, 21 patients (81%) returned to an oral diet, while 5 patients still needed tube feeding. For 23 patients (88%), the quality and strength of the voice was more or less normal. Of the 18 patients who were employed before their treatment, 10 were able to return to their job within 12 months. Xerostomia was reported by 17 patients (65%). Further detailed analysis showed statistically significant differences in pretreatment scores between the 1-year QOL group and the failure group, ie, physical well-being, functional well-being, and the head and neck scales (P<.05). Differences in these groups with respect to sex, age, tumor site, or stage could not be found.

Conclusion  Given that only patients with locally (anatomic or functional) inoperable stage IV disease were treated, the results are promising, underlining the feasibility of the RADPLAT protocol.


From the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

RADPLAT: An Alternative to Surgery?
Alkureishi et al.
The Oncologist 2006;11:469-480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.