You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 1, January 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Tracheoesophageal Speech in a Developing World Community

Johannes J. Fagan, MD, FCS(SA), MMed(Otol); Roslyn Lentin, BSc(Log); Manuel F. Oyarzabal, MD, FRCS; Sedick Isaacs, PhD, FSS, MBCS; Sean L. Sellars, MD, FRCS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:50-53.

Objectives  To determine the tracheoesophageal speech results in a Third World medical practice; to examine the impact of socioeconomic status, literacy, and proximity to specialist services on tracheoesophageal speech; to assess whether these factors should affect patient selection for fistula speech; and to determine guidelines for voice prosthesis selection.

Design  Retrospective analysis.

Setting  Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, which serves a Third World community.

Patients  Ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent total laryngectomy between January 1, 1996, and October 1, 1998. Patients who undergo total laryngectomy routinely have a primary tracheoesophageal fistula created for speech.

Main Outcome Measures  Speech outcomes after total laryngectomy; tracheoesophageal speech in relation to social class, literacy, and proximity to specialist services; and experience with removable and indwelling valves.

Results  Fifty-nine (81%) of 73 patients acquired useful speech. Speech outcome was not affected by employment status or proximity to specialist services. Although speech was affected by literacy and housing, several illiterate shack dwellers acquired good speech. Average device life of removable prostheses was 16 weeks (>4 months in 35% [64/183]). Indwelling prostheses had an average life of 28 weeks.

Conclusions  Tracheoesophageal speech results in a Third World community equate with those in the Developed World. All patients who undergo laryngectomy and have adequate manual dexterity and cognitive function should be given a trial of fistula speech. Removable voice prostheses can successfully be used as indwelling prostheses.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Fagan, Oyarzabal, and Sellars) and Logopedics (Ms Lentin), University of Cape Town School of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, and Medical Informatics (Dr Isaacs), Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(1):95-96.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.