You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 1, January 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Anesthesia
 •Anesthesia of Head & Neck
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Anesthetic Techniques for Pharyngeal Flap Surgery

Effects on Postoperative Complications

Meir Bennun, MD; Bernardo Goldstein, MD; Edna Zohar, MD; Yehuda Finkelstein, MD; Robert Jedeikin, BSc, MB, ChB, FFA(SA); Brian Fredman, MB, BCh

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:35-39.

Objective  To assess the effects of 2 different anesthetic techniques on early complications after superior pharyngeal flap surgery.

Design  Randomized, prospective, single-blind study.

Setting  Large referral hospital.

Patients  One hundred patients undergoing superior pharyngeal flap surgery for the correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency were randomly divided into 2 equal groups to receive either isoflurane or propofol-based anesthesia.

Interventions  Following induction of anesthesia with fentanyl citrate and propofol, patients were randomized to receive either isoflurane or propofol for the maintenance of general anesthesia. The inspired isoflurane concentration and propofol infusion rate were adjusted to maintain a stable depth of anesthesia as judged by clinical signs and hemodynamic responses to surgical stimuli.

Main Outcome Measures  Recovery from anesthesia, recovery from surgery, and early postoperative complications.

Results  The groups were similar in age, weight, height, induction time, surgery time, extubation time, and anesthetic time. The time (mean ± SD) required to achieve a maximal Steward Recovery Score was 7 ± 14 minutes in the propofol group compared with 32 ± 28 minutes in the isoflurane group (P<.04). No significant differences in postoperative patient satisfaction scores, time to first swallow, drinking time, and time to "home readiness" were noted. Overall, 17 patients (17%) developed airway-related complications and 2 of the patients (2%) were accounted as severe. Two patients (2%) bled from the operation site. However, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the groups.

Conclusions  When compared with isoflurane administration for maintenance of general anesthesia, propofol-based anesthesia was associated with more rapid mental and psychomotor recovery. However, airway-related complications and "home readiness" were similar between the groups.


From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Drs Bennun, Goldstein, Zohar, Jedeikin, and Fredman) and Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Finkelstein), Meir Hospital, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(1):95-96.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.