 |
 |

Tissue Eosinophilia in Chronic Sinusitis
Quantification Techniques
Neil Bhattacharyya, MD;
Darshan K. Vyas, MD;
Frank P. Fechner, MD;
Richard E. Gliklich, MD;
Ralph Metson, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:1102-1105.
Objective To ascertain the reliability of a proposed method for quantifying tissue
eosinophilia in sinus mucosa.
Design Prospective cohort study.
Interventions and Outcome Measures Pathology slides from patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for
chronic rhinosinusitis were independently assessed by 2 reviewers. Using a
proposed systematic counting method, the degree of tissue eosinophilia was
quantified. Disease severity was assessed by computed tomographic (CT) staging.
Intrarater, interrater, and intrapatient reliability was determined using
correlational reliability analysis. The degree of correlation between tissue
eosinophilia and CT stage was determined.
Results One hundred thirty-two slides from 65 patients were reviewed. The mean
(SD) eosinophil density was 23.4 (37.2) eosinophils per high-power field.
Only 12 patients (18%) had no eosinophils on histopathologic analysis. Strong
intrarater (r 0.91 for each rater, P<.001) and interrater reliability (r 0.82
between raters, P<.001) was noted for the quantification
method. A moderate degree of correlation was found between CT scan stage and
degree of tissue eosinophilia (Spearman = 0.62, P<.001).
Conclusions The proposed method for quantifying tissue eosinophilia in sinus mucosa
is reliable and valid. A relatively strong correlation exists between CT scan
stage and tissue eosinophilia in chronic rhinosinusitis.
From the Division of Otolaryngology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr
Bhattacharyya), Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
(Drs Vyas, Fechner, Gliklich, and Metson), and Department of Otology and Laryngology,
Harvard Medical School (Drs Bhattacharyya, Vyas, Fechner, Gliklich, and Metson),
Boston, Mass.
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(9):1146-1148.
FULL TEXT
|