You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 7, July 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Salivary Gland Disorders
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quality of Life After Great Auricular Nerve Sacrifice During Parotidectomy

Nilesh Patel, MD; Gady Har-El, MD; Richard Rosenfeld, MD, MPH

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:884-888.

Objective  To determine the impact of great auricular nerve (GAN) sacrifice during parotidectomy on patients' quality of life.

Design  Historical cohort survey of patients who had undergone GAN sacrifice during parotidectomy.

Setting  Tertiary academic otolaryngologic practice.

Patients and Methods  Fifty-three patients who had undergone GAN sacrifice during parotidectomy completed an 8-item quality-of-life survey with a 7-point response scale designed to measure outcome after GAN sacrifice during parotidectomy.

Results  Thirty patients (57%) reported experiencing at least 1 abnormal symptom, but the mean number of symptoms decreased significantly with time, from a mean of 2.3 during the first year to 0.2 after 5 years (P<.001). Even among patients experiencing symptoms, 23 (77%) reported only a little or no bother caused by the symptoms, and 27 (90%) reported no interference or almost none with their daily activities. The degree of bother or interference reported had a moderate positive correlation with the number of abnormal sensations reported.

Conclusions  The results suggest that, while many patients experienced sensory deficits, the overall quality of life was not significantly affected after GAN sacrifice during parotidectomy. Patients who report multiple abnormal sensations, however, would benefit from additional counseling and from reassurance that the number of sensations will diminish with time. Further study evaluating the effect of preservation of the posterior branch of the GAN during parotidectomy on patients' quality of life is needed.


From the Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):889-890.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Great auricular nerve morbidity after nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy.
Ryan and Fee
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:642-649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.