This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (29)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Dentistry/ Oral Medicine  • Surgical Oncology  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Giulianno Molina de Melo, MD; Karina de Cássia Braga Ribeiro, DDS, MSc; Luiz P. Kowalski, MD, PhD; Daniel Deheinzelin, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:828-833.

Background  The surgical treatment of head and neck cancer can be limited by the risk of postoperative complications. Early identification of risk factors based on clinical characteristics may assist therapeutic planning.

Objectives  To identify risk factors for these complications and to evaluate their prognostic significance.

Methods  The medical records of 110 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma admitted from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1994, who underwent radical surgery were reviewed. Data collected included demographic information, comorbidities, extended clinical severity stage, treatment, complications, and survival. The ² test was used to verify the association between the variables. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to build models with independent predictive factors for the risk of complications and death, respectively.

Results  The overall complication rate was 50%. Dehiscence and infection rates were 20.9% and 22.7%, respectively. The death rate was 3.6%. Forty-seven patients (42.7%) were electively referred to the intensive care unit (ICU). The occurrence of postoperative complications was associated with extended clinical severity stage (P = .02), type of surgery (P = .03), ICU (P = .03), type of reconstruction (P = .02), Functional Severity Index (P = .03), neck dissection (P = .002), and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) (P = .008). The number of complications was significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay (r = 0.24, P = .01) and with the Functional Severity Index (r = 0.19, P = .04). Five-year overall survival was affected by the type of complications (none, 41.7%; local, 34.1%; and local plus systemic, 0% [P<.001]), ICU (no, 46.3%; yes, 20.7% [P = .001]), and extended clinical severity stage (stage 1, 75.6%; stage 2, 50%; stage 3, 28.6%; and stage 4, 10.2% [P<.001]). In a multivariate analysis bilateral neck dissection (relative risk = 3.57, P = .01) and an APACHE II score greater than 10 (relative risk = 3.86, P = .02) were independent risk factors for complications. The predictive prognostic model consisted of the following: staying in the ICU (hazard ratio = 1.83), local plus systemic complications (hazard ratio = 6.27), and extended clinical severity stage (stage 3, hazard ratio = 3.57; stage 4, hazard ratio = 6.34).

Conclusions  Bilateral neck dissection and the APACHE II score were identified as risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer, which also increase the length of hospital stay. The occurrence of systemic complications, advanced extended clinical severity stage, and staying in an ICU adversely affect the prognosis. Therefore, the prompt recognition of the adverse risk factors for postoperative complications may guide proactive interventions that may improve survival and achieve cost-effectiveness.

From the School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (Dr de Melo), and the Hospital Cancer Registry (Dr Ribeiro), Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology (Dr Kowalski), and the Intensive Care Unit (Dr Deheinzelin), Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, Brazil.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):889-890.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Enteral Nutrition Support of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Raykher et al.
Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22:68-73.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA Scores and the Risk of Perioperative Complications in Patients With Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer
de Cassia Braga Ribeiro and Kowalski
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:739-745.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perioperative Complications, Comorbidities, and Survival in Oral or Oropharyngeal Cancer
Ribeiro et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:219-228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT