 |
 |

Molecular Marker Expression in Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Benjamin D. Smith, BA;
Grace L. Smith, MPH;
Darryl Carter, MD;
Michael P. DiGiovanna, MD, PhD;
Katherine M. Kasowitz, BS;
Clarence T. Sasaki, MD;
Bruce G. Haffty, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:780-785.
Objective To determine the relative prognostic value of p53, cyclin D1, epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
expression in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Design Retrospective cohort study.
Patients Fifty-six patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
referred to the Department of Therapeutic Radiology at YaleNew Haven
Hospital (Conn) between 1981 and 1992 who were treated with gross total surgical
resection and postoperative external beam radiotherapy.
Results Archival tumor tissue was stained with monoclonal antibodies directed
against these 4 oncoproteins and scored for staining intensity and percent
distribution by a pathologist blinded to the patients' clinical outcomes.
Frequency of marker expression was 48% for p53, 20% for cyclin D1, 64% for
EGFR, and 41% for VEGF. In multivariate analysis, EGFR positivity was protective
against locoregional relapse (relative risk [RR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 0.11-0.66; P = .002). In contrast, advanced
N stage predicted poor locoregional relapse-free survival (RR, 1.94; 95% CI,
1.03-3.66; P = .04). Predictors of poor overall survival
in multivariate analysis included VEGF positivity (RR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.75-7.13; P<.001) and black race (RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.05-5.85; P = .04). Cyclin D1 and p53 expression were not significantly
associated with prognosis in this cohort.
Conclusions In oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery
and postoperative radiotherapy, VEGF and EGFR expression may influence clinical
outcome. If confirmed, these results have potential implications for the determination
of patient prognosis and the development of biologically based pharmacotherapies.
From the Departments of Therapeutic Radiology (Mr B. D. Smith, Ms G.
L. Smith, and Dr Haffty), Pathology (Dr Carter), Internal Medicine, Section
of Medical Oncology (Dr DiGiovanna and Ms Kasowitz), and Surgery, Section
of Otolaryngology (Dr Sasaki), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven,
Conn.
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):889-890.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, Sex, and Smoking As Indicators of Response to Therapy and Survival in Oropharyngeal Cancer
Kumar et al.
JCO 2008;26:3128-3137.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quantitative Determination of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer by Using Automated Quantitative Analysis
Psyrri et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:5856-5862.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies
Kyzas et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1043-1055.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cyclin D1 Is a Valuable Prognostic Marker in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Yu et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:1160-1166.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Expanding the Clinical Development of Bevacizumab
Chen
The Oncologist 2004;9:27-35.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Therapeutic Exploitation of the Physiological and Molecular Genetic Alterations in Head and Neck Cancer
Le and Giaccia
Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:4287-4295.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tissue-Specific Gene Expression of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Vivo by Complementary DNA Microarray Analysis
Sok et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:760-770.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|