You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 5, May 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evaluation of Esterified Hyaluronic Acid as Middle Ear–Packing Material

Geming Li, MD; Joseph G. Feghali, MD; Elizabeth Dinces, MD; John McElveen, MD; Thomas R. Van De Water, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:534-539.

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy of esterified hyaluronic acid (MeroGel) as a middle ear (ME)–packing material.

Design  Randomized controlled trial.

Material  Twenty-four guinea pigs.

Intervention  Group 1, MeroGel-treated animals (n = 10), bilateral wounding of ME mucosa with 5 of the animals receiving the MeroGel packing in the left ME and 5 of the animals receiving MeroGel in the right ME; group 2, absorbable gelatin sponge–treated animals (n = 10), with the same experimental protocol as in group 1 except that the absorbable gelatin sponge was the packing material; group 3, untreated animals (n = 4), unilateral wounding of the left ME mucosa in 2 animals and in 2 animals in the right ME, with no packing material. Auditory brainstem recordings were performed for all groups before the ME operation and 5 days and 6 weeks after the operation.

Results  Auditory brainstem response recordings at postoperative day 5 showed that all ears with ME packing had hearing losses in the frequency range of 500 to 4000 Hz. The recovery of hearing acuity at postoperative week 6 was significantly better in group 1 (MeroGel-treated) guinea pigs compared with group 2 (the absorbable gelatin sponge–treated) animals. In group 2 animals, 20% of the packing material remained in the ME cavities and new bone formation was observed, while in group 1 animals, there was less packing material in the ME and no formation of new bone.

Conclusions  MeroGel is a nonototoxic packing material with a high level of biocompatibility for ME mucosa; it is an effective supportive material following ME surgery and is easily expelled from the ME cavity.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Li and Van De Water) and Neuroscience (Dr Van De Water), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Otolaryngology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (Drs Feghali, Dinces, and Van De Water); Department of Otolaryngology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr Feghali); and Carolina Ear and Hearing Clinic, Raleigh, NC (Dr McElveen).

Corresponding author and reprints: Thomas R. Van De Water, PhD, Department of Otolaryngology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Pkwy S, Kennedy Center, Room 302, Bronx, NY 10461 (e-mail: vandewat{at}aecom.yu.edu).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(5):606-608.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.