This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (17)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal

Susan J. Herdman, PT, PhD; Michael C. Schubert, PT, MS; Ronald J. Tusa, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:1205-1210.

Objective  To determine the contribution of central preprogramming of eye movements to dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during head movement in patients with vestibular hypofunction.

Study Design  Prospective, clinical study.

Setting  Tertiary care, academic hospitals.

Participants  Twenty-six healthy subjects and 20 patients with unilateral (UVL) and 7 with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) (age range, 20-86 years).

Interventions  Diagnostic interventions, including caloric and rotational chair testing.

Main Outcome Measure  Measurements of DVA during predictable (DVA-predictable) and unpredictable (DVA-unpredictable) head movements using a computerized test.

Results  There was a difference between DVA-predictable and DVA-unpredictable scores in all groups (P<.02). The difference between DVA-predictable and DVA-unpredictable scores for the BVL group was significantly greater than that for the other groups (P<.005). Age was a significant factor in DVA-unpredictable scores for the healthy subjects (P<.001) and UVL group (P<.02). Comparisons of DVA between groups were significant (P<.03), with the following exceptions: UVL group for head movements toward the unaffected side for DVA-predictable and DVA-unpredictable scores, compared with healthy subjects, and UVL group for head movements toward the affected side for DVA-predictable scores, compared with the BVL group.

Conclusions  Unpredictable head movements cause a greater decrement in visual acuity than do predictable head movements. This suggests that central programming of eye movements and/or efference copy contributes to gaze stability during predictable head movements in healthy subjects and patients with vestibular hypofunction. Patients with BVL use central programming of eye movements to maintain gaze stability more than do healthy subjects or patients with UVL.

From the the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Herdman and Mr Schubert), the Department of Neurology (Dr Tusa), and Yerkes Research Center (Dr Tusa), Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(10):1289-1291.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Recovery of Dynamic Visual Acuity in Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Herdman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:383-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimizing the Sensitivity of the Head Thrust Test for Identifying Vestibular Hypofunction
Schubert et al.
ptjournal 2004;84:151-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery of Dynamic Visual Acuity in Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction
Herdman et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:819-824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Head Thrust Test With Head Autorotation Test Reveals That the Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Is Enhanced During Voluntary Head Movements
Della Santina et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1044-1054.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT