You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 1, January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neuro-otology
 •Acoustic Neuroma
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem Response Testing for the Diagnosis of Acoustic Neuromas

Richard J. Schmidt, MD; Robert T. Sataloff, MD, DMA; Jason Newman, MD; Joseph R. Spiegel, MD; Donald L. Myers, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:19-22.

Objectives  To determine the sensitivity of auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing for detecting acoustic neuromas and to determine whether the test is less sensitive for detecting small tumors.

Design  Retrospective review of the medical charts of 58 patients with acoustic neuroma who had all of the data necessary for inclusion in the study.

Setting  University-affiliated referral practice of one neurotologist.

Patients  Patients with acoustic neuromas who had both ABR tracings and magnetic resonance imaging films available for review.

Main Outcome Measures  Positive ABR and negative ABR results correlated with tumor size.

Results  Tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 7 cm. The overall sensitivity of ABR in diagnosing acoustic neuromas was 90%. However, ABR was progressively less sensitive with decreasing tumor size. Only 7 (58%) of the 12 tumors 1 cm or smaller were detected by ABR.

Conclusion  Auditory brainstem response testing cannot be relied on for detection of small acoustic neuromas and should not be used as a criterion to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging should be performed when an acoustic neuroma is suspected clinically.


From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Schmidt, Sataloff, Newman, and Spiegel) and Neurosurgery (Dr Myers), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa.

Corresponding author and reprints: Robert T. Sataloff, MD, DMA, 1721 Pine St, Philadelphia, PA 19103.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(1):94.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.