This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Correction  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Radiation Therapy  • Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Alert me on articles by topic

Irena Honocodeevar-Boltear, MD, PhD; Miha argi, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1097-1100.

Objective  To evaluate the voices of irradiated patients with early glottic carcinoma and to compare these with the voices of healthy volunteers.

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Subjects and Methods  The voice samples (sustained vowel) of 50 patients (44 men and 6 women) who had been irradiated for T1 (43 subjects) or T2 (7 subjects) glottic squamous carcinoma at least 1 year prior to the study were analyzed with the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (Kay Elemetrics Corp, Lincoln Park, NJ) and compared with those of a normal group of 50 age- and sex-matched volunteers. Average fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio, and degree of voiceless elements were determined. In the irradiated group, videostroboscopy was performed. The patients assessed their voice fatigue.

Results  The irradiated subjects demonstrated significantly higher values for jitter, shimmer, and degree of voiceless elements than did the healthy volunteers. The values for noise-to-harmonic ratio were higher in the irradiated group, but the difference was not significant (P = .08). The values for fundamental frequency were almost equal in both groups. In most of the irradiated subjects, some irregularities of the vocal fold vibration were noticed. Many of these patients also reported voice fatigue.

Conclusions  Radiation therapy for early glottic cancer results in poorer voice quality compared with normal age- and sex-matched speakers. In most of the irradiated patients, greater than normal effort in voice production was found based on patient assessment. This may result from stiffness of the vibratory source and inadequate compensatory maneuvers in phonation. We suggest that voice therapy during and after radiation therapy may result in better voice quality.

From the University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(9):1171.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Transoral Laser Surgery for Early Glottic Cancers
Pradhan et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:623-625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT