You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 8, August 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Nasal Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Computer-Aided Assessment of Bony Nasal Pyramid Dimensions

Martin J. Citardi, MD; Scott Hardeman, MD; Chris Hollenbeak, PhD; Mimi Kokoska, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:979-984.

Objective  To develop a computer-enabled paradigm for assessment of bony nasal pyramid dimensions.

Design  Retrospective review of archived computed tomographic data.

Setting  Tertiary level academic center.

Patients  Patients who had undergone computed tomographic scans for computer-aided transsphenoidal hypophysectomy were included. Previous nasal surgery, inflammatory sinus disease, and documented maxillofacial trauma were exclusion criteria.

Intervention  Archived computed tomographic scan images were reviewed using the software tools on a computer-aided surgical (CAS) system (StealthStation; Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tenn). Standardized methods for the measurement of nasal bone thickness and bony nasal pyramid projection were established.

Main Outcome Measurements  Bony nasal pyramid projection and nasal bone thickness were determined.

Results  Computed tomographic scans from 8 patients were reviewed. Nasal bone thickness at the level of lateral osteotomy was 2.39 ± 0.68 (mean + SD) mm, while nasal bone thickness at the level of intermediate osteotomy was 1.18 + 0.30 mm. Nasal projection from the nasomaxillary suture to the rhinion in the axial plane was 19.20 + 3.10 (mean + SD) mm, while the corresponding nasal projection at the nasion was 20.61 + 3.52 mm.

Conclusions  This brief report presents a new paradigm for the assessment of the bony nasal pyramid. Additional normative data are necessary. This information has important implications for rhinoplasty instrument design, surgical planning, and aesthetic assessment. It is likely that computer-enabled review of archived computed tomographic images for maxillofacial assessment will become increasingly accepted. Of course, further modifications of computer technology and its specific applications are expected.


From the Department of Otolaryngology, Saint Louis University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Drs Citardi, Hardeman, and Kokoska); and the Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey (Dr Hollenbeak).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(8):1043-1044.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.