You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 7, July 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of Power-Assisted Adenoidectomy vs Adenoid Curette Adenoidectomy

Paul Stanislaw, Jr, MD; Peter J. Koltai, MD; Paul J. Feustel, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:845-849.

Objective  To compare the safety and efficacy of power-assisted adenoidectomy (PAA) vs adenoid curette adenoidectomy (ACA).

Design  A prospective randomized study.

Setting  Children's hospital of a tertiary care medical center.

Patients  Ninety patients (aged 1-13 years) underwent PAA, and 87 patients (aged 1-12 years) underwent ACA.

Main Outcome Measures  The parameters evaluated were operative time, blood loss, completeness and depth of resection, injuries to surrounding structures, short- and long-term complications, surgeon satisfaction with the procedure, and parents' assessment of the patient's postoperative recovery period.

Results  The PAA was 20% faster (P<.001) and had 27% less blood loss (P<.001) than the ACA. It provided a more complete resection(P<.001) and better control of the depth of resection (P<.05). Surgeon satisfaction was greater with PAA (P<.001). There was no difference in the recovery period or parent satisfaction. One patient in the PAA group returned to the operating room for control of postoperative bleeding, and 1 child in the ACA group returned to the hospital for postoperative dehydration.

Conclusion  The PAA provides a faster, dryer, more complete, and more surgically satisfying resection than the ACA.


From the Division of Otolaryngology (Dr Stanislaw) and the Department of Surgery (Drs Stanislaw and Feustel), Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; and the Section of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Koltai). Dr Koltai is a consultant for Linvatec Corporation, Largo, Fla.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(7):916.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Postoperative Recovery After Microdebrider Intracapsular or Monopolar Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study.
Sobol et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:270-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory Powered Intracapsular Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy in Children Younger Than 3 Years
Bent et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1197-1200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Powered Partial Adenoidectomy
Murray et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:792-796.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.