You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 6, June 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Functional Speech Outcomes After Laryngectomy and Pharyngolaryngectomy

Megan J. McAuliffe, BSpPath(Hons); Elizabeth C. Ward, BSpThy(Hons), PhD; Lynell Bassett, BSpThy; Kylie Perkins, BSpThy

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:705-709.

Objective  To compare and contrast functional speech outcomes of patients having undergone total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy who use tracheoesophageal speech as their primary mode of communication.

Design  Group comparison design.

Setting  Adult acute tertiary care hospital.

Patients  Thirty patients who underwent total laryngectomy and 13 who underwent pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction. All patients used tracheoesophageal speech.

Intervention  Group comparisons across measures of speech intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, voice satisfaction and levels of perceived voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress.

Main Outcome Measure  The existence of any significant differences between the 2 groups on measures of intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, and voice satisfaction and levels of voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress.

Results  Statistical comparisons confirmed reduced functional intelligibility (P<.05), reduced vocal quality (P<.01), and higher levels of disability (P<.05) in the pharyngolaryngectomy group. However, no significant difference was observed between the proportion of patients classified as "successful" tracheoesophageal speech users in either group. Low levels of handicap and high levels of patient well-being were recorded in both groups.

Conclusion  Despite the perceptual differences in voice quality and intelligibility observed between the 2 groups, tracheoesophageal speech that is functional, effective, and perceived by the patients as satisfactory can be achieved after total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction.


From the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Queensland (Ms McAuliffe and Dr Ward), and the Speech Pathology Department, The Royal Brisbane Hospital (Dr Ward and Mss Bassett and Perkins), Brisbane, Queensland.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.