You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 4, April 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Delayed Repair of Transected Nerves

Effect of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Melinda S. Moir, MD; Michelle Z. Wang, BA; Michael To; Joanne Lum, BS; David J. Terris, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:501-505.

Objective  To determine if administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after peripheral nerve transection can improve the functional outcome in situations where epineurial repair must be delayed.

Design  Randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

Subjects  Thirty-four Sprague-Dawley rats.

Intervention  Sciatic nerves were transected and, after a 2-week delay, repaired with epineurial sutures. Animals were assigned to receive daily administration of lactated Ringer solution (LR [control] group); BDNF delivered at the time of nerve transection through 2 weeks after nerve repair, for a total of 4 weeks (BDNF-early group); or BDNF delivered at the time of nerve repair through 2 weeks after repair (BDNF-late group). Outcome was assessed using sciatic functional indices (SFIs) and histomorphometric analysis.

Results  The SFI maximal recovery was superior in the BDNF groups, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (SFI, -90.1 ± 9.6 [LR group], -85.7 ± 7.6 [BDNF-early group], and -84.6 ± 4.8 [BDNF-late group], where normal function is 0 and complete loss of function is -100; P=.27). The mean axon diameter tended to be greater in the BDNF groups compared with the LR group, ie, 2.43 ± 0.23 µm (LR group), 2.80 ± 0.44 µm (BDNF-early group), and 2.83 ± 0.38 µm (BDNF-late group) (P=.05).

Conclusions  The local administration of BDNF to nerves that underwent transection and then repair after a delay resulted in an increase in axonal diameters and maximal SFIs, a difference that did not reach statistical significance. The timing of BDNF administration after nerve transection did not affect neuronal regeneration.


From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.