You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Role of Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection in Patients With Positive Nodes

Venkateswara R. Kolli, MD; Rajiv V. Datta, MD; James B. Orner, MD; Wesley L. Hicks, Jr, DDS, MD; Thom R. Loree, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:413-416.

Background  Supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) is currently used as a staging procedure for patients with clinically negative nodes in the neck who are at increased risk (>20%) for metastatic disease.

Objective  To assess the potential role of SOHND in patients with clinically positive nodes at levels I, II, or III. We evaluated, in particular, whether selective neck dissection in patients with clinically positive nodes results in decreased regional control and/or diminished survival.

Patients and Methods  We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent SOHND from January 1, 1971, to December 31, 1997. The oral cavity and oropharynx represented the primary sites in the majority of the patients. Two-year follow-up information was available on all patients.

Results  During the study period, 69 patients underwent 84 SOHNDs. Of the 69 patients, there were 30 patients with clinically negative nodes and 39 patients with clinically positive nodes in the neck. The overall regional control rates were 88% vs 71% for pathologically negative vs positive nodes, respectively, with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved regional control in patients with pathologically positive nodes but not in patients with N0 disease (P = .005). Similar results were noted in patients with both clinically and pathologically positive nodes.

Conclusions  Supraomohyoid neck dissection in patients with pathologically positive nodes in the neck is inadequate therapy for regional control without postoperative radiation therapy. However, in patients with pathologically positive nodes in the neck, SOHND with postoperative radiation therapy can achieve regional control comparable to that of comprehensive neck dissection and postoperative radiation therapy.


From the Departments of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (Drs Kolli, Datta, Hicks, and Loree) and Radiation Oncology (Dr Orner), Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preservation of the Internal Jugular Vein in the Radical Treatment of Node-Positive Neck--Is It Safe?
Martins et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:364-370.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Results of 100 Consecutive Comprehensive Neck Dissections: Implications for Selective Neck Dissections
Sivanandan et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1369-1373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preserving Level IIb Lymph Nodes in Elective Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Lim et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1088-1091.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neck Dissection: An Operation in Evolution: Hayes Martin Lecture
Myers and Gastman
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:14-25.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.