You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Experience With Various 3-Dimensional Navigation Systems in Head and Neck Surgery

Andreas Rüdiger Gunkel, MD; Wolfgang Freysinger, PhD; Walter Franz Thumfart, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:390-395.

Objective  To evaluate the benefits and difficulties encountered when using various 3-dimensional (3-D) navigation systems in head and neck procedures.

Design  Five different navigation systems were used for preoperative planning and intraoperative 3-D navigation in procedures at the paranasal sinuses, the frontal and lateral skull bases, and the petrous bone.

Intervention  Intraoperative 3-D localizing systems (position-sensitive mechanical arms, infrared cameras, etc) demand reliable patient fixation on the operating table. We achieved this by developing a noninvasive head holder. Other systems allow patient movements by using magnetic digitizing technology (ARTMA System) and sophisticated programming.

Results  Having surpassed an initial learning curve, we now achieve an accuracy of 1 to 2 mm regularly. Especially in paranasal and frontal basal surgery, all navigation systems used provide valuable positioning information during surgery. In particular for revision or tumor surgery, decisive benefits resulted from use of these systems: shorter overall operation time; safer manipulation near delicate structures; and reliable identification of the skull base even in patients with bleeding, scarring, or missing anatomical landmarks.

Conclusions  We performed approximately 250 operations with different systems and introduced navigation at the lateral skull base and the petrous bone with mechanical, optic, and magnetic digitizers. In these anatomical areas, navigation was used successfully; the technical challenge is greatest at the lateral skull base, however.


From the Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A-Mode Ultrasound-Based Registration in Computer-Aided Surgery of the Skull
Amstutz et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:1310-1316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

3D-imaging of the facial skeleton with an isocentric mobile C-arm system (Siremobil Iso-C3D)
Heiland et al.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:21-25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer-Assisted Navigation System in Pediatric Intranasal Surgery
Postec et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:797-800.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frameless Optical Computer-Aided Tracking of a Microscope for Otorhinology and Skull Base Surgery
Zheng et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1233-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.