You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 2, February 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Radiation and Intra-arterial Cisplatin

Effects on Arteries and Free Tissue Transfer

Joseph Valentino, MD; Lisa Weinstein, MD; Richard Rosenblum, MD; William Regine, MD; Michael Weinstein, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:215-219.

Objectives  To determine the histopathologic effect of combined intra-arterial cisplatin administration and hyperfractionated external beam radiation treatment (HYPERRADPLAT) on potential recipient arteries in the neck and to analyze the efficacy of free tissue transfer (FTT) in patients undergoing HYPERRADPLAT.

Design  Cisplatin-perfused and nonperfused artery segments were harvested during planned interval neck dissection performed 6 to 10 weeks after HYPERRADPLAT. These segments were evaluated by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. All patients undergoing FTT after HYPERRADPLAT were reviewed retrospectively.

Setting  Academic medical center.

Patients and Intervention  Eight patients undergoing HYPERRADPLAT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and planned interval neck dissection were prospectively studied. All patients had a perfused artery sampled, and 3 also had a nonperfused (control) artery sampled. Five patients undergoing FTT after HYPERRADPLAT were retrospectively analyzed for outcome of FTT.

Results  No consistent histological or ultrastructural differences were detected between injected and noninjected arteries. Both demonstrated intimal thickening, collagen and elastin deposition in the intimal layer, and, occasionally, intimal smooth muscle proliferation. A smaller fraction of the injected and noninjected arteries demonstrated smooth muscle cell vacuolation, elastic fiber degeneration, and calcific deposits. Four of 5 FTTs in patients undergoing HYPERRADPLAT were successful.

Conclusions  The changes seen in the injected and noninjected arteries were characteristic of ionizing radiation. Arteries treated with HYPERRADPLAT had no observable difference from vessels treated with radiation alone. These vessels can be used with caution as recipient vessels for FTT. Further clinical experience is needed to establish the expected results of FTT using these arteries.


From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Valentino and Rosenblum) and the Departments of Pathology (Drs L. Weinstein and M. Weinstein) and Radiation Oncology (Dr Regine), University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center; and the Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Valentino), Lexington, Kentucky.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.