This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (52)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

John P. Carey, MD; Lloyd B. Minor, MD; George T. Nager, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:137-147.

Objective  To determine the incidence and etiology of dehiscences of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone archive.

Design  A microscopic study was performed of 1000 temporal bones from 596 adults in a university hospital registry. Specimens were sectioned vertically in the plane of the superior semicircular canal. Measurements of minimum bone thickness over the superior canal were made in a subset of 108 randomly chosen specimens. All bones were examined for thinning or dehiscence relative to these norms. Clinical histories, when available, were reviewed.

Results  Complete dehiscence of the superior canal was identified in 5 specimens (0.5%), at the middle fossa floor (n = 1) and where the superior petrosal sinus was in contact with the canal (n = 4). In 14 other specimens (1.4%), the bone at the middle fossa floor (n = 8) or superior petrosal sinus (n = 6) was no thicker than 0.1 mm, significantly less than values measured in the control specimens (P<.001). Abnormalities were typically bilateral. Specimens from infants demonstrated uniformly thin bone over the superior canal in the middle fossa at birth, with gradual thickening until 3 years of age.

Conclusions  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal occurred in approximately 0.5% of temporal bone specimens (0.7% of individuals). In an additional 1.4% of specimens (1.3% of individuals), the bone was markedly thin (0.1 mm), such that it might appear dehiscent even on ultra–high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone. Sites affected were in the middle fossa floor or a deep groove for the superior petrosal sinus, often bilaterally. These abnormalities may arise from failure of postnatal bone development. Thin areas of bone over the superior canal may be predisposed to disruption by trauma.

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Spontaneous Meningoencephalocele of the Temporal Bone: Clinical Spectrum and Presentation
Nahas et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:509-518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

PULSE-SYNCHRONOUS TORSIONAL PENDULAR NYSTAGMUS IN UNILATERAL SUPERIOR CANAL DEHISCENCE
Hain and Cherchi
Neurology 2008;70:1217-1218.
FULL TEXT  

CT Evaluation of Bone Dehiscence of the Superior Semicircular Canal as a Cause of Sound- and/or Pressure-induced Vertigo
Belden et al.
Radiology 2003;226:337-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Superior Canal Dehiscence: Mechanisms of Pressure Sensitivity in a Chinchilla Model
Hirvonen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1331-1336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT