You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Determining the Presence or Absence of Metastatic Retropharyngeal Adenopathy

David D. Morrissey, MD; J. Michael Talbot, MD; James I. Cohen, MD, PhD; Mark K. Wax, MD; Peter E. Andersen, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1478-1481.

Objective  To decide the accuracy of computed tomography in determining the presence or absence of metastatic retropharygeal adenopathy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Design  A comparison of the results of retrospective blinded review of preoperative computed tomographic scans with the histologic findings of retropharyngeal node dissection at the time of surgery.

Setting  Academic tertiary care center.

Patients  Twenty-six patients with advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Main Outcome Measures  Computed tomographic findings and histologic results of retropharyngeal node dissection.

Results  The retropharyngeal nodes were pathologically positive for metastasis in 6 (23%) of the 26 patients. The radiologist (J.M.T.) correctly read the scan in 3 of 6 patients with histologically proved metastasis, and in 14 of 20 patients with histologic features negative for metastasis. The sensitivity of the radiologist reading was 50%, and the specificity was 70%. The positive predictive value was 33%, and the negative predictive value was 82%.

Conclusion  The presence of retropharyngeal node metastasis cannot be determined by computed tomographic imaging alone.


From the Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University (Drs Morrissey, Cohen, Wax, and Andersen), and the East Portland Imaging Center (Dr Talbot), Portland, Ore. Dr Morrissey is now in private practice in Boulder, Colo.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(12):1510.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Gross et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:169-173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Syncope as a Sign of Occult Malignant Recurrence in the Retropharyngeal and Parapharyngeal Space: CT and MR Imaging Findings in Four Cases
Nakahira et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1257-1260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.