You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Internal Support of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage

Carlos A. Arévalo-Silva, MD; Roland D. Eavey, MD; Yilin Cao, MD; Martin Vacanti, MD; Yulai Weng, MD; Charles A. Vacanti, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1448-1452.

Background  Auricles previously created by tissue engineering in nude mice used a biodegradable internal scaffold to maintain the desired shape of an ear. However, the biodegradable scaffold incited a compromising inflammatory response in subsequent experiments in immunocompetent animals.

Objective  To test the hypothesis that tissue-engineered autologous cartilage can be bioincorporated with a nonreactive, permanent endoskeletal scaffold.

Materials and Methods  Auricular elastic cartilage was harvested from Yorkshire swine. The chondrocytes were isolated and suspended into a hydrogel (Pluronic F-127) at a cell concentration of 5 x 107 cells/mL. Nonbiodegradable endoskeletal scaffolds were formed with 1 of 5 polymers: (1) high-density polyethylene, (2) soft acrylic, (3) polymethylmethacrylate, (4) extrapurified Silastic, and (5) conventional Silastic. Three groups were studied: (1) a control group using only the 5 polymers, (2) the 5 polymers enveloped by Pluronic F-127 only, and (3) the implants coated with Pluronic F-127 seeded with chondrocytes. All constructs were implanted subdermally; implants containing cells were implanted into the same animal from which the cells had been islolated. The implants were harvested after 8 weeks of in vivo culture and histologically analyzed.

Results  Only implants coated by hydrogel plus cells generated healthy new cartilage. With 3 polymers (high-density polyethylene, acrylic, and extrapurified Silastic), the coverage was nearly complete by elastic cartilage, with minimal fibrocartilage and minimal to no inflammatory reaction. The Food and Drug Administration–approved conventional Silastic implants resulted in fragments of fibrous tissue mixed with elastic cartilage plus evidence of chronic inflammation. The polymethylmethacrylate implant was intermediate in the amount of cartilage formed and degree of inflammation.

Conclusions  This pilot technique combining tissue-engineered autologous elastic cartilage with a permanent biocompatible endoskeleton demonstrated success in limiting the inflammatory response to the scaffold, especially to high-density polyethylene, acrylic, and extrapurified Silastic. This model facilitates the potential to generate tissue of intricate shape, such as the human ear, by internal support.


From the Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and the Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Arévalo-Silva and Eavey); and the Department of Anesthesia, Laboratory for Tissue Engineering (Drs Arévalo-Silva, Cao, M. Vacanti, Weng, and C. A. Vacanti), and the Department of Pathology (Dr M. Vacanti), University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(12):1510.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tissue-Engineered Cartilage as a Graft Source for Laryngotracheal Reconstruction: A Pig Model
Kamil et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1048-1051.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.