You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Sleep Apnea
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Quality of Life in Children With Obstructive Sleep Disorders

Lianne M. de Serres, MD; Craig Derkay, MD; Susan Astley, PhD; Richard A. Deyo, MD, MPH; Richard M. Rosenfeld, MD, MPH; George A. Gates, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1423-1429.

Objective  To validate a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument for children with obstructive sleep disorders (OSDs).

Design  Prospective cohort study using a 6-item health-related instrument (OSD-6).

Subjects  One hundred caregivers of patients with OSDs secondary to adenotonsillar hypertrophy (age range, 2-12 years) from 2 tertiary care, pediatric otolaryngology practices.

Intervention  The OSD-6 was administered on initial presentation and 4 to 5 weeks after adenotonsillectomy. A subset of patients repeated the OSD-6 within 3 weeks after presentation to assess test-retest reliability.

Main Outcome Measures  Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness to clinical change of the OSD-6 score.

Results  Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74). Median OSD-6 score was 4.5 (0- to 6-point scale) with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life (QOL). Construct validity was demonstrated by the moderate correlation between OSD-6 score and global adenoid and tonsil-related QOL (R = -0.62), strong correlation between the OSD-6 change score and change in global adenoid and tonsil-related QOL (R = -0.63), and the moderate correlation between the change score and parent estimate of clinical change (R = 0.40). The mean change in OSD-6 score after adenotonsillectomy was 3.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.4). The mean standardized response was 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.7) indicating the instrument's large responsiveness to clinical change. The change score was very reliable (R = 0.85).

Conclusions  The OSD-6 is a reliable, responsive, easily administered instrument. It is valid for detecting change after adenotonsillectomy in children with OSDs.


From the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center (Dr de Serres) and Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington (Drs de Serres and Gates), Seattle; Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughter, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk (Dr Derkay); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health (Dr Astley) and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine (Dr Deyo), Seattle; and the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, State University of New York, Health Science Center at Brooklyn, and Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn (Dr Rosenfeld). The authors have no commerical, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(12):1510.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality of Life and Sleep Study Findings After Adenotonsillectomy in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Stewart et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:308-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adenotonsillectomy for upper respiratory infections: evidence based?
van Staaij et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2005;90:19-25.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertrophy: open, randomised controlled trial
van Staaij et al.
BMJ 2004;329:651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Adenotonsillectomy for Obstructive Sleep Disorders on Quality of Life
Choi and Schoem
AAP Grand Rounds 2002;8:16-17.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Adenotonsillectomy on Quality of Life in Children With Obstructive Sleep Disorders
de Serres et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:489-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.