You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 6, June 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Considerations for Free-Flap Reconstruction of the Hard Palate

Neal D. Futran, MD, DMD; Jeffrey R. Haller, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:665-669.

Objective  To evaluate the use of microvascular free-tissue transfers in the reconstruction of hard palate defects.

Design  Retrospective review of a case series.

Setting  Two tertiary referral centers.

Patients  Thirty patients had hard palatal defects that resulted from ablative oncologic surgery: 10 total or subtotal palatal defects, 14 hemipalatal defects, and 6 anterior arch defects.

Intervention  Nine fibular, 11 rectus abdominus, 3 scapular, 6 radial forearm, and 1 latissimus dorsi free flaps were used to reconstruct these defects.

Main Outcome Measures  Separation of the oral cavity from the nasal and sinus cavities, complications, oral diet, speech intelligibility, and overall quality of life.

Results  No flap failures occurred, and all palatal defects were ultimately sealed. Nineteen patients eat a regular diet, while the remainder maintain a soft diet. Twelve patients use a conventional dental prosthesis; 8 of the dental prostheses are supported by implants. Of 23 patients examined for speech, 18 have no disorders, 3 exhibit hyponasal speech, and 2 have hypernasal speech. Overall University of Washington, Seattle, quality of life scores were fair in 2 patients, good in 6, and excellent in 12.

Conclusions  Free-flap reconstruction of the palate provides reliable permanent separation of the oral and sinonasal cavities in one stage. In addition, the potential for dental rehabilitation with the restoration of masticatory function and normal phonation exists. Flap choice is tailored to specific palatal defects as well as patient needs.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Futran); and the Division of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Haller).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Combined Intraoral and Lateral Temporal Approach for Palatal Malignancies With Temporalis Muscle Reconstruction
Browne and Holland
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:531-537.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Midface Reconstruction With the Fibula Free Flap
Futran et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:161-166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Iliac Crest Internal Oblique Osteomusculocutaneous Free Flap Reconstruction of the Postablative Palatomaxillary Defect
Genden et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:854-861.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microvascular Free Flap Reconstructive Options in Patients With Partial and Total Maxillectomy Defects
Triana et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:91-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.