You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 11, November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Skull Base Procedures
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A New Classification for Malignant Tumors Involving the Anterior Skull Base

Giulio Cantù, MD; Carlo Lazzaro Solero, MD; Luigi Mariani, PhD; Franco Mattavelli, MD; Natalia Pizzi, MD; Lisa Licitra, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:1252-1257.

Objectives  To propose our clinical classification of malignant ethmoid tumors and to compare it with the last American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)–Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification, published in 1997.

Design  Retrospective review.

Setting  Tertiary cancer facility.

Patients  We evaluated 123 consecutive patients undergoing craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors involving the anterior skull base. The mean follow-up was 60 months. Fifty-nine patients (48%) presented with recurrent disease after prior therapy. We classified them with a new classification system (Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori) based on the most commonly accepted unfavorable prognostic factors (involvement of dura mater; intradural extension; involvement of the orbit and, in particular, of its apex; invasion of maxillary, frontal, and/or sphenoid sinuses; and invasion of the infratemporal fossa and skin. We also classified patients with the AJCC classification published in 1997.

Main Outcome Measures  Disease-free status and overall survival rate. To study a possible association with tumor stage, the Cox regression model was adopted.

Results  According to our classification, patient distribution by tumor type was T2, n=46; T3, n=29; and T4, n=48 (no T1 tumors were present in the series). For previously untreated patients, 5-year disease-free survival estimates were T2, 57%; T3, 50%; and T4, 13%. For relapses, corresponding figures were T2, 31%; T3, 23%; and T4, 1%. The prognostic difference among stages was statistically significant (P<.001). Similar results were obtained for overall survival. In contrast, patient distribution among different AJCC stages was less balanced, and we failed to detect a significant association with the clinical outcome using this classification.

Conclusion  We propose the use of our staging system by all those specialists in the field willing to validate the classification and possibly apply it for clinical and investigational purposes.


From the Unit of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery (Drs Cantù, Mattavelli, and Pizzi), Division of Medical Statistics and Biometrics (Dr Mariani), and Unit of Medical Oncology A (Dr Licitra), Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, and the Second Division of Neurosurgery, Istituto Nazionale Neurologico "C Besta" (Dr Lazzaro Solero), Milan, Italy.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.