You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 8, August 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neuro-otology
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Balance Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo

A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Study

Michael Weiser, MBChB; Wolfgang Strösser, MD, MBChB; Peter Klein, MSc

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:879-885.

Objective  To compare the efficacy and safety of a homeopathic remedy (Vertigoheel, Heel Inc, Albuquerque, NM) vs betahistine hydrochloride (active control) in the treatment of patients with vertigo of various origins in a confirmative equivalence trial.

Design  Randomized (1:1) double-blind controlled clinical trial.

Setting  Fifteen study centers (general practice) in Germany between November 1995 and November 1996.

Subjects  A total of 119 patients with vertigo of various origins (from whom 105 patients could be analyzed as intended per protocol).

Main Outcome Measures  Frequency, duration, and intensity of vertigo attacks.

Results  Both homeopathic and conventional treatments showed a clinically relevant reduction in the mean frequency, duration, and intensity of the vertigo attacks. The therapeutic equivalence of the homeopathic remedy and betahistine was established statistically.

Conclusions  Concerning the main efficacy variable, therapeutic equivalence between the homeopathic remedy and betahistine could be shown with statistical significance (confirmative analysis). Both remedies reduced the frequency, duration, and intensity of vertigo attacks during a 6-week treatment period. Also, vertigo-specific complaints were significantly reduced in both treatment groups.


From the Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH, Baden-Baden (Dr Weiser), Clinical Research and Pharma Consulting, Bergisch Gladbach (Dr Strösser), and Datenservice Eva Hönig GmbH, Rohrbach (Mr Klein), Germany.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laboratory Research in Homeopathy: Pro
Khuda-Bukhsh
Integr Cancer Ther 2006;5:320-332.
ABSTRACT  

On Equivalence Trials and Alternative Medicine
Yueh and Piccirillo
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:403-404.
FULL TEXT  

Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo
Sampson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:497-497.
FULL TEXT  

Pain, Depression, and Fatigue in Cancer
Block
Integr Cancer Ther 2002;1:323-326.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.