This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (14)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Philip A. Pollice, MD; John L. Frodel, Jr, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:802-808.

Objective  To evaluate the aesthetic and functional results of secondary reconstruction of the upper midface and lower orbit following globe-sparing maxillectomy.

Design  Retrospective analysis.

Setting  University medical center.

Patients  Six patients, all having previously undergone globe-sparing maxillectomies with or without postoperative radiotherapy, were selected for secondary reconstruction of the upper midface.

Intervention  Free calvarial bone grafts (CBGs) alone or in conjunction with alloplastic material were used to reconstruct the upper midface and lower orbit both aesthetically and functionally. Bone grafts were secured using lag screw and nonrigid techniques. Pedicled temporoparietal fascia (TPF) flaps provided coverage of the reconstructions and internal lining of the maxillectomy cavity.

Outcome Measures  Aesthetic and functional results of upper midface and lower orbit as determined by preoperative and postoperative photographs and physical examination.

Results  All patients had considerable improvement in upper midfacial contours. All patients had improvement of globe position. Patients with diplopia before reconstruction noted improvement after reconstruction, although 1 patient continued to have moderate diplopia. Complications included persistent globe malposition, persistent diplopia, bone graft resorption, partial loss of 1 TPF flap, need for revision surgery, and subjectively worsened appearance in 1 patient.

Conclusions  Reconstruction with CBGs, alloplastic material, and TPF may reliably, effectively, and efficiently rehabilitate the functional and aesthetic upper midfacial deficits of select patients with secondary reconstruction after globe-sparing maxillectomy. However, patients with evidence of excessive scarring may benefit more from free-tissue transfer reconstruction.

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md. Dr Frodel is now with the Division of Otolaryngology and Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Precontoured Positioning Plates and Pericranial Flaps in Midfacial Reconstruction to Optimize Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes
Ducic and Oxford
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:387-392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Midfacial Reconstruction Using Calvarial Split Bone Grafts
Smolka et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:131-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Orbital Volume Augmentation for Late Enophthalmos
Frodel
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:63-63.
FULL TEXT  

Temporoparietal Fascial Flap in Orbital Reconstruction
Lai and Cheney
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:196-201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microvascular Free Flap Reconstructive Options in Patients With Partial and Total Maxillectomy Defects
Triana et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:91-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT