You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 7, July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Surgery
 •Laser Surgery
 •Dermatology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

An Ultrastructural Comparison of Mechanical Dermabrasion and Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing in the Minipig Model

Jeffrey P. Campbell, MD; Margaret H. Terhune, MD; Steven D. Shotts, MD; Raleigh O. Jones, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:758-760.

Objective  To compare the histological and ultrastructural changes in skin collagen with mechanical dermabrasion and pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the minipig model.

Setting  Academic medical center.

Subjects  Yucatan minipig animal skin model.

Main Outcome Measures  Comparison of light microscopic and ultrastructural (electron microscopic) changes in the skin following the 2 resurfacing modalities.

Results  No significant difference in collagen histological characteristics or ultrastructure was detected between the 2 comparison groups.

Conclusions  When mechanical dermabrasion or pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing is used with similar-depth injury to the dermis in this model, the histological changes seen via light microscopy and ultrastructural changes seen via electron microscopy are similar between the 2 treatment modalities.


From the Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Drs Campbell and Shotts), Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Campbell, Shotts, and Jones), and the Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Terhune), University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Subdermal Carbon Dioxide Laser Cutaneous Contraction
Goco and Stucker
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2002;4:37-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why Does Carbon Dioxide Resurfacing Work?: A Review
Ross et al.
Arch Dermatol 1999;135:444-454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.