You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 7, July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Surgery
 •Laser Surgery
 •Dermatology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Closed Dressings After Laser Skin Resurfacing

James P. Newman, MD; R. James Koch, MD; Richard L. Goode, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:751-757.

Objective  To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of closed dressings after full facial resurfacing with the carbon dioxide laser.

Design  Prospective cohort of men and women undergoing full facial carbon dioxide laser resurfacing.

Setting  Ambulatory surgical center at a university hospital.

Patients  Forty consecutive patients randomized to 1 of 4 dressing groups.

Interventions  All patients underwent full facial resurfacing with a carbon dioxide laser system. One of 5 closed dressings (single- or 3-layer composite foam, plastic mesh, hydrogel, or polymer film) was placed immediately after the procedure. Closed dressings were changed on postoperative day 2 and removed on postoperative day 4.

Outcome Measures  Objective postoperative criteria of erythema, scarring, reepithelialization, and surface irregularities were recorded and photodocumented. Comparisons were made among the closed dressing groups as well as with a group of historical control subjects treated with open dressings. The ease of application, office time for preparation and application, and cost of the individual dressings were collected. Patient characteristics of overall acceptance, comfort, and ease of maintenance were recorded with a visual analog scale.

Results  There were no complications of scarring, surface irregularities, or contact dermatitis from the application or maintenance of the closed dressings. There were no significant differences in the number of days of postoperative erythema or in the rate of facial reepithelialization among the groups. Most patients preferred not to continue with the closed dressings past 2 days. Positive features from the use of closed dressings included reduction in crust formation, decreased pruritus, decreased erythema, and decreased postoperative pain, compared with historical controls. Negative features included time in preparation and application of the dressings. Costs ranged from $9.79 to $50 per dressing change.

Conclusions  Closed dressings are safe and offer benefits noted during the first 4 postoperative days. Patients can be expected to maintain a closed dressing for at least 24 hours but no longer than 4 days. The positive features of closed dressings and patient acceptance outweigh the cost and office time involved with their application and maintenance.


From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Stanford, Calif.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of a Silicone Occlusive Dressing After Laser Skin Resurfacing
Batra et al.
Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1317-1321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantification of Skin Elasticity Changes Associated With Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser Skin Resurfacing
Koch and Cheng
Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:272-275.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.