You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 6, June 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Functional Results of Primary Closure vs Flaps in Oropharyngeal Reconstruction

A Prospective Study of Speech and Swallowing

Fred M. S. McConnel, MD; Barbara Roa Pauloski, PhD; Jerilyn A. Logemann, PhD; Alfred W. Rademaker, PhD; Laura Colangelo, MS; Donald Shedd, MD; William Carroll, MD; Jan Lewin, PhD; Jonas Johnson, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:625-630.

Background  The preservation of speech and swallowing function is the primary goal when reconstructing soft tissue defects in the oral cavity or oropharynx. The type of reconstructive procedure used should be based on outcome data examining speech and swallowing function; yet, there is a paucity of such information.

Objectives  To present the results of a multi-institutional prospective study of speech and swallowing function before and after soft tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity and oropharynx, and to compare 3 methods of reconstruction with respect to speech and swallowing function: primary closure, distal myocutaneous flap, and microvascular free flap.

Design  Prospective case-comparison study.

Setting  Four leading head and neck cancer institutions.

Patients  The patients were selected from a database of 284 patients treated at the different institutions. The patients were matched for the location of the oral cavity or oropharyngeal defect and the percentage of oral tongue and tongue base resection. Those patients who had previous speech and swallowing deficits and patients in whom postoperative fistulas or wound infections developed were excluded from the study.

Methods  The patients underwent speech and swallowing evaluation preoperatively and 3 months after healing. This evaluation included videofluoroscopic studies of swallowing and tests of speech intelligibility and sentence articulation. Videofluoroscopy provided measures of swallowing efficiency and bolus movement. Liquid and paste consistencies were used in evaluating swallowing function.

Main Outcome Measure  The functional results of the reconstruction.

Results  Patients who had primary closure were more efficient at swallowing liquids, had less pharyngeal residue, a longer oral transit time with paste, and higher conversational intelligibility than patients who underwent reconstruction with a distal flap. Compared with patients who underwent reconstruction with a free flap, those who had primary closure had more efficient swallowing of liquids, less pharyngeal residue, and shorter pharyngeal delay times with paste. No difference in the speech and swallowing function existed between patients treated with distal myocutaneous flaps and those treated with microvascular free flaps.

Conclusion  Contrary to the current theory of oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction, we found that the use of primary closure resulted in equal or better function than the use of flap reconstruction in patients with a comparable locus of resection and percentage of oral tongue and tongue base resection.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (Dr McConnel); the Departments of Communication Sciences and Disorders (Drs Pauloski and Logemann) and Biometry (Dr Rademaker and Ms Colangelo), Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill; the Departments of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY (Dr Shedd); and the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham (Dr Carroll), the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Lewin), and the University of Pittsburgh Eye and Ear Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Johnson).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Decreased Short- and Long-term Swallowing Problems With Altered Radiotherapy Dosing Used in an Organ-Sparing Protocol for Advanced Pharyngeal Carcinoma
Smith et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:831-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fasciocutaneous Flap Reconstruction of the Tongue and Floor of Mouth: Outcomes and Techniques
Haughey et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1388-1395.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects in the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx
Abemayor and Blackwell
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:909-912.
FULL TEXT  

Long-term Swallowing Problems After Organ Preservation Therapy With Concomitant Radiation Therapy and Intravenous Hydroxyurea: Initial Results
Smith et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:384-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Results After Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: A Different Perspective
Reece et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:474-476.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.