You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 4, April 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effects of More Conservative Neck Dissections and Radiotherapy on Nodal Yields From the Neck

Neil Bhattacharyya, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:412-416.

Objective  To determine the effects of conservative neck dissections (NDs) and preoperative radiotherapy on the quantitative recovery of lymph nodes from the neck.

Design  Retrospective review of case series. Data were obtained for age, preoperative TNM staging, type of ND, preoperative radiotherapy, total nodal yield (tNY), and positive nodal yield (pNY). The tNY and pNY were analyzed with factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine differences among types of ND and the effect of radiotherapy.

Setting  Tertiary care center for head and neck cancer.

Patients  Consecutive sample of 135 NDs in 110 patients with cancer of the head and neck.

Results  A significant difference in tNY was found among dissections (P<.001, ANOVA). Supraomohyoid ND had a significantly lower mean tNY (9.9 nodes) than both radical ND and modified radical ND (21.8 and 26.3 nodes, respectively; P<.05). Functional ND also had a significantly lower tNY (16.1 nodes) than modified radical ND (P<.05); the differences between radical ND and both functional ND and modified radical ND were not statistically significant. Positive nodal yield was not different among the types of dissections (P=.62). Preoperative radiotherapy significantly decreased mean tNY from 22.0 to 17.1 nodes (P=.02) over all types of dissections. Differences in tNY among dissection types were independent of the effect of radiotherapy. The presence or absence of preoperative radiotherapy had no significant effect on pNY (P=.18).

Conclusions  Conservative modifications of the classic radical ND differ with respect to the quantity of cervical lymph nodes excised, but survival may not be altered since the pNY is not significantly different. When compared with the radical ND, the modified radical ND and functional ND do not compromise the quantity of cervical nodes excised. Radiotherapy significantly reduces the quantity of cervical nodes, but a significant number of nodes will still remain.


From the Joint Center for Otolaryngology and the Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgical Treatment of Cervical Nodal Metastases in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Bhattacharyya
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:1101-1104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nodal Metastasis in Major Salivary Gland Cancer: Predictive Factors and Effects on Survival
Bhattacharyya and Fried
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:904-908.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Cervical Lymphadenectomy After Aggressive Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy: The Feasibility of Selective Neck Dissection
Stenson et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:950-956.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.