This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (32)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck  • Alert me on articles by topic

Christopher L. Lykins, MD; Craig D. Friedman, MD; Peter D. Costantino, MD; Roger Horioglu, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:153-159.

Objective  To assess the effects of hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) on the developing feline craniofacial skeleton.

Design  Fronto-orbital craniotomies were performed on 14 kittens and reconstructed by autograft or HAC. By design, animals in which the craniofacial skeleton was reconstructed with HAC also underwent obliteration of the left frontal sinus. After achievement of skeletal maturity, animals were sacrificed and compared by 11 standardized cranial measurements obtained by sliding caliper. Additional analyses included histological studies, histomorphometry, and computed tomography.

Subjects  Twenty-one 12-week-old female cats were divided into 3 groups, composed of 7 specimens.

Intervention  The control animals underwent periosteal elevation alone (group 1). The remaining animals underwent unilateral fronto-orbital craniotomy and subsequent reconstruction with orthotopic bone flap replacement (group 2) or HAC (group 3).

Results  All animals survived the study with no evidence of wound infection or implant failure. Gross morphological studies demonstrated excellent contour reconstruction in both experimental groups. Craniometric analysis detected 1 intergroup difference that consisted of a wider skull in group 3 on the reconstructed side. An intragroup difference in orbital height was also seen in group 3. Computed tomography demonstrated a solid appearance of the implant with obliteration of the left frontal sinus in group 3. Histological studies showed that HAC was osseointegrated to native bone, with areas of new bone interspersed throughout the implants. No significant inflammatory response or fibrous encapsulation was noted. Histomorphometry demonstrated that implants were replaced by osseous tissue in 44% to 50% of the animals within 5 months.

Conclusion  Hydroxyapatite cement is safe and effective for craniofacial reconstruction in the developing feline and may be appropriate for similar applications in humans.

From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Lykins); the Department of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa, and Section of Otolaryngology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn (Dr Friedman); the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr Costantino); and the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr Horioglu). Drs Friedman and Costantino are consultants to and shareholders in Orthofix, Inc, Richardson, Tex.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of hydroxyapatite cement for frontal sinus obliteration after mucocele resection.
Taghizadeh et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:416-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Experimental Facial Augmentation With Hydroxyapatite Cement
Kokoska et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:290-294.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Carbonated Apatite and Hydroxyapatite in Craniofacial Reconstruction
Mathur et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:379-383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT