You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 9, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Submucosal Tumor Extension in Hypopharyngeal Cancer

Chiu M. Ho, FRACS; Wing F. Ng, MRCPath; Kam H. Lam, MS; William I. Wei, MS; Anthony P. W. Yuen, FRCS

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(9):959-965.


Abstract

Objectives
To study the incidence and extent of submucosal tumor extension in hypopharyngeal cancer and to evaluate the impact on the tumor recurrence and overall survival rates.

Method
Fifty-seven resected specimens of hypopharyngeal cancer were studied in detail from January 1986 to December 1989 by use of the whole-organ, step—serial sectioning technique.

Results
Three types of submucosal tumor extension could be identified. Type I extension was characterized by a tumor with a smooth round contour that extended submucosally. The mucosa was thereby elevated and was detectable on gross inspection at operation. In type II extension, tongues and islands of tumor infiltrated within the submucosa, and these were not noticeable on gross examination. Skip metastasis in the submucosa where the submucosal tumor was completely separated from the main tumor bulk was classified as type III extension. Thirty-three patients (58%) had submucosal tumor extension. The frequencies (and extents of submucosal tumor extension) in the superior, medial, lateral, and inferior directions were 16% (3-10 mm), 37% (2-37 mm), 26% (2-37 mm), and 28% (3-35 mm), respectively. Two thirds of the submucosal extension was type I (22 of 33), and only 1 patient had a true skip lesion submucosally (type III extension). Type II submucosal extension was found in one third of the patients (11 of 33). This occurred significantly more often in the patients who had received radiotherapy before surgery (82% 9/11]; P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.44). The presence of submucosal tumor extension had no effect on the tumor recurrence and overall survival rates.

Conclusions
The incidence of submucosal tumor extensions in hypopharyngeal cancer is high (58%), but most (67%) of them can be detected grossly at operation. The presence of submucosal tumor extension does not adversely affect the survival and tumor recurrence rates.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:959-965



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital (Dr Ho) and The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital (Drs Lam, Wei, and Yuen), and the Department of Pathology, Ruttonjee Hospital (Dr Ng), Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Dilemma of Treating Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: More or Less: Hayes Martin Lecture
Wei
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:229-232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.