You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intraoperative Mapping of Sensate Flaps

Electrophysiologic Techniques and Neurosomal Boundaries

John S. Rhee, MD; Donald J. Weisz, PhD; Martin B. Hirigoyen, MD, FRCS; Uttam Sinha, MD; Nelson Alcaraz, MD; Mark L. Urken, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(8):823-829.


Abstract

Background
The desirability of restoring sensation to the upper aerodigestive tract has led to an expanded use of sensate flaps for reconstruction of mucosal defects. Sensation can be restored via preformed neural pathways through the anastomosis of recipient and donor nerves, provided that the sensate flap falls within the boundaries of the neurosome for the identified sensory nerve.

Objectives
To perform detailed electrophysiologic mappings of neurosomes of potential sensate flap donor sites, to describe their variability, and to investigate the usefulness of intraoperative mapping in terms of flap design and harvesting.

Design
A case series of 27 patients who were undergoing free flap reconstruction of various postablative head and neck defects were examined. Two silver—silver chloride recording electrodes were placed in direct contact with the dissected sensory nerve, and the overlying skin was either mechanically or electrically stimulated. Auditory feedback, as well as visualization of the responses on an oscilloscope, determined whether the stimulated area fell within the neurosome. This technique was applied to the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve of the radial forearm flap (n=15), the lateral sural cutaneous nerve of the fibula flap (n=5), the subcostal nerve of the iliac crest flap (n=6), and the dorsal cutaneous rami of spinal nerve T-1 or T-2 of the scapula flap (n=1).

Results
The neurosome of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve was relatively consistent with the variability only at the distal boundary (ie, the dorsum of the hand). The neurosome of the lateral sural cutaneous nerve was more variable, falling into 2 distinct innervation patterns: one showing innervation that was limited to the upper lateral and posterior portions of the calf and the other demonstrating significant extension into the lower half of the calf. The neurosome of the subcostal nerve showed little variability and consistently overlapped the proposed skin paddle. The neurosome of the T-1 or T-2 spinal nerve was mapped in 1 patient and is described.

Conclusions
The consistency of neurosomal boundaries is dependent on the donor site. Intraoperative mapping of flap donor sites may not only assure the harvesting of a true sensate flap, but may also allow for intraoperative decision making with regard to possible modifications of flap design and harvesting techniques. Two new sensate flaps from the iliac crest and scapula are accurately described.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:823-829



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Rhee, Hirigoyen, Sinha, Alcaraz, and Urken) and Neurosurgery (Dr Weisz), Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY. Dr Sinha is (Dr Hirigoyen is now with the Department of Plastic Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, England, and with the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Radial Forearm With Fibula and Scapula Osteocutaneous Free Flaps for Oromandibular Reconstruction
Militsakh et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:571-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensate Radial Forearm Free Flaps in Tongue Reconstruction
Kuriakose et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1463-1466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anatomical Variations of the Sensory Nerves to the Fibular Osteocutaneous Flap
Dolan et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:252-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oromandibular Reconstruction Using Microvascular Composite Flaps: Report of 210 Cases
Urken et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:46-55.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.