You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 8, August 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lipogranulomas as Complications of Septorhinoplasty

Gerhard Rettinger, MD; Helmuth Steininger, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(8):809-814.


Abstract

Background
Nasal tumors caused by lipogranulomas are a rare complication of a rhinoplasty; only 1 report of this occurrence was found in the literature.

Objective
To present a series of 4 patients with subcutaneous nasal tumors after each had undergone a rhinoplasty, together with a review of the literature and the clinical consequences.

Design
Case series.

Setting
Hospitalized care at a university ear, nose, and throat department.

Patients
Four patients were referred within 6 months from a single department for consultation because of broad nasal pyramids after each patient had undergone a rhinoplasty. The origin of the deformities was not known.

Interventions
Ear, nose, and throat and ultrasound examinations and computed tomography (ie, bone and soft tissue examinations). Two patients had undergone revision surgery and histological examinations of subcutaneous fibrous tissue.

Main Outcome Measure
Search for the origin of the nasal deformity.

Results
All 4 patients had wide nasal pyramids. One of the 4 patients also had subcutaneous tumors of the nasal dorsum, glabella, and medial canthus area; this patient had subcutaneous cystic lesions on computed tomography and ultrasound examination and a foreign body reaction around "empty spaces" on histological examination. The tumorlike lesions were the result of displaced ointment from the endonasal packings. Two of the 4 patients with minor deformities did not undergo any surgical revision, and they still had some moderate reduction of the cystic lesions within 1 year after the rhinoplasty.

Conclusions
Lipogranulomas caused by ointments that are used together with nasal packings are most often reported in the orbit after endonasal sinus surgery. The incidence should be more frequent in patients who undergo a rhinoplasty because connections between the endonasal cavity and the extranasal subcutaneous layer are created routinely by osteotomies or removal of a hump. Thus, postoperative deformities (eg, inadequate narrowing of the bony pyramid or supratip thickening [permanent swelling of the nasal tip]) should be examined by use of computed tomography, if lipid ointments were used endonasally. For prevention, no lipid substances should be applied together with pressure from packings. In the case of a lipogranuloma, surgical removal via an open approach is the treatment of choice.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:809-814



Author Affiliations

From the Ear-Nose and Throat Department, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany (Dr Rettinger), and the Institute of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (Dr Steininger).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Foreign-Body Inclusion Cyst Presenting on the Lateral Nasal Sidewall 1 Year After Rhinoplasty
Bassichis and Thomas
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:530-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mucous Cyst Formation After Rhinoplasty
Romo III et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:208-211.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.