You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Power-Assisted Adenoidectomy

Peter J. Koltai, MD; Axay S. Kalathia, MD; Paul Stanislaw, MD; Heidi A. Heras, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(7):685-688.


Abstract

Objective
To quantify that the use of powered instrumentation for adenoidectomy is an improvement over traditional techniques.

Design
Retrospective case series of 40 consecutive children undergoing power-assisted adenoidectomy compared with 40 consecutive children undergoing conventional transoral adenoidectomy with a curet.

Setting
Tertiary care center.

Main Outcome Measures
Operative time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, and complications.

Results
With power-assisted adenoidectomy, the mean operative time was significantly faster (11 minutes vs 19 minutes for the conventional method), mean blood loss was not significantly different (22 mL vs 32 mL for the conventional method), mean length of hospitalization after the procedure was not significantly different (2.95 hours vs 2.8 hours for the conventional method), and there were no surgical complications with either technique.

Conclusion
In comparison with conventional techniques, power-assisted adenoidectomy provides significant advantages that are subjectively apparent but can also be objectively measured.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:685-688



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY. Dr Koltai is a consultant for the Linvatec Corp, Largo, Fla.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Postoperative Recovery After Microdebrider Intracapsular or Monopolar Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study.
Sobol et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:270-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized, Controlled, Multisite Study of Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Using Low-Temperature Plasma Excision
Chan et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1303-1307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obstructive Adenoid Tissue: An Indication for Powered-Shaver Adenoidectomy
Havas and Lowinger
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:789-791.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Powered Partial Adenoidectomy
Murray et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:792-796.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Power-Assisted Adenoidectomy vs Adenoid Curette Adenoidectomy
Stanislaw et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:845-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.