You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Nasal Cavity Geometry Measured by Acoustic Rhinometry and Computed Tomography

Laurent Gilain, MD; André Coste, MD; Fréderic Ricolfi, MD; Estelle Dahan; Dominique Marliac, MD; Roger Peynegre, MD; Alain Harf, MD; Bruno Louis, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(4):401-405.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the significance of crosssectional areas obtained by acoustic rhinometry.

Design
Comparison of data obtained by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography (CT).

Setting
Outpatient clinic.

Patients
Nine adults with nasal obstruction due to turbinate hypertrophy.

Main Outcome Measures
Acoustic rhinometry and CT were performed after nasal decongestion. The acoustic area-distance curve was analyzed based on 3 notches (Al, A2, and A3) corresponding to 3 local minimal areas. Computed tomographic measurements were made in the coronal plane at 0.5-cm intervals, and the narrowest sections in the anterior (S1), middle (S2), and posterior (S3) parts of the nasal cavity were selected. Mean specific section areas and volumes were computed by integration of the acoustic area-distance curves using the same procedure for the 2 methods.

Results
Significant correlations were found between acoustic and CT areas in the anterior nasal cavity (Al vs SI, P<.001; A2 vs S2, P<.005). Acoustic and CT anterior volumes from Al to A2 and from SI to S2 were significantly correlated with each other (P<.005). No correlation was found between acoustic and CT areas measured at the posterior part of the nose (A3 vs S3). A weak correlation was evidenced between acoustic and CT posterior volumes from A2 to A3 and from S2 to S3 (P<.05).

Conclusions
Acoustic rhinometry may be particularly well suited to the evaluation of anterior nasal geometry during clinical studies. At the posterior part of the nose, acoustic measurements may be of limited clinical relevance.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:401-405



Author Affiliations

From the Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France (Dr Gilain), and the Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, (Drs Coste, Marliac, and Peynegre), Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles (Drs Ricolfi and Harf and Ms Dahan), and Inserm U296 (Dr Louis), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Improved Nasal Airflow After Adenoidectomy on Nasal Erectile Tissue
Brinckmann et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:832-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size
Tarhan et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;99:616-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Segmental analysis of nasal cavity compliance by acoustic rhinometry
Brugel-Ribere et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;93:304-310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

IgE-Mediated Reactions and Hyperreactivity in Pregnancy Rhinitis
Ellegard and Karlsson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1121-1125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.