 |
 |

Nasal Cavity Geometry Measured by Acoustic Rhinometry and Computed Tomography
Laurent Gilain, MD;
André Coste, MD;
Fréderic Ricolfi, MD;
Estelle Dahan;
Dominique Marliac, MD;
Roger Peynegre, MD;
Alain Harf, MD;
Bruno Louis, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(4):401-405.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To determine the significance of crosssectional areas obtained by acoustic rhinometry.
Design Comparison of data obtained by acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography (CT).
Setting Outpatient clinic.
Patients Nine adults with nasal obstruction due to turbinate hypertrophy.
Main Outcome Measures Acoustic rhinometry and CT were performed after nasal decongestion. The acoustic area-distance curve was analyzed based on 3 notches (Al, A2, and A3) corresponding to 3 local minimal areas. Computed tomographic measurements were made in the coronal plane at 0.5-cm intervals, and the narrowest sections in the anterior (S1), middle (S2), and posterior (S3) parts of the nasal cavity were selected. Mean specific section areas and volumes were computed by integration of the acoustic area-distance curves using the same procedure for the 2 methods.
Results Significant correlations were found between acoustic and CT areas in the anterior nasal cavity (Al vs SI, P<.001; A2 vs S2, P<.005). Acoustic and CT anterior volumes from Al to A2 and from SI to S2 were significantly correlated with each other (P<.005). No correlation was found between acoustic and CT areas measured at the posterior part of the nose (A3 vs S3). A weak correlation was evidenced between acoustic and CT posterior volumes from A2 to A3 and from S2 to S3 (P<.05).
Conclusions Acoustic rhinometry may be particularly well suited to the evaluation of anterior nasal geometry during clinical studies. At the posterior part of the nose, acoustic measurements may be of limited clinical relevance.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:401-405
Author Affiliations
From the Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France (Dr Gilain), and the Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, (Drs Coste, Marliac, and Peynegre), Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles (Drs Ricolfi and Harf and Ms Dahan), and Inserm U296 (Dr Louis), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Effect of Improved Nasal Airflow After Adenoidectomy on Nasal Erectile Tissue
Brinckmann et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:832-836.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size
Tarhan et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;99:616-623.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Segmental analysis of nasal cavity compliance by acoustic rhinometry
Brugel-Ribere et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;93:304-310.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
IgE-Mediated Reactions and Hyperreactivity in Pregnancy Rhinitis
Ellegard and Karlsson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:1121-1125.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|