You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 3, March 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Clinical and Histologic Response of Subcutaneous Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and Porous High-Density Polyethylene (Medpor) Implants to Acute and Early Infection

Anthony P. Sclafani, MD; J. Regan Thomas, MD; Artemus J. Cox, MD; Margaret H. Cooper, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(3):328-336.


Abstract

Objective
To examine the responses of subcutaneously implanted expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE, Gore-Tex) and porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE, Medpor) to experimentally induced infection.

Design
Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted subcutaneously with either e-PTFE or PHDPE implants. Inocula of Staphylococcus aureus were injected directly over the implants and the wounds were observed for clinical signs of infection. After the animals were killed, the implants were harvested and underwent histologic examination.

Subjects
Twenty-eight adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200 to 250 g.

Intervention
A 8-mm diameter, 1-mm-thick implant of either e-PTFE or PHDPE was placed in a subcutaneous pocket over each animal's dorsum. Either at the time of implantation or 14 days afterward, an inoculum of 109 colony-forming units of S aureus was injected transcutaneously directly over each implant. The animals were observed for 7 days before being killed. The implants were harvested and examined by both conventional light and scanning electron microscopy, and the degree of capsule reaction, infection, inflammation, and implant degradation was evaluated.

Results
Implants inoculated at the time of implantation were more likely to become clinically infected. Results for e-PTFE and PHDPE implants were similar in this group (5 of 5 e-PTFE and 5 of 5 PHDPE implants infected). The PHDPE implants inoculated 14 days after implantation were less likely to become infected (1 of 4 infected) than e-PTFE implants (3 of 4 infected), and were statistically less likely to become infected than PHDPE implants inoculated immediately after implantation (25% vs 100%; P<.02). Histologically, this resistance to infection correlated with increasing fibrovascular ingrowth into the PHDPE implants. The infected PHDPE implant had little to no ingrowth compared with PHDPE control implants. The uninfected e-PTFE implant had evidence of early fibrovascular ingrowth into the peripheral pores of the implant.

Conclusions
Because of differences in pore size, PHDPE promotes faster fibrovascular ingrowth. The presence of vascularized host tissue in and around the implant lends stability and resistance to experimentally induced infection. Conservative management of clinical implant infections should be considered if bacterial seeding occurs after substantial fibrovascular ingrowth is present. Future alloplast designs should include pore sizes that will encourage invasion of the implant by host tissue.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:328-336



Author Affiliations

From the Facial Plastic Surgery Center (Drs Sclafani and Thomas), the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Sclafani, Thomas, Cox, and Cooper), and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology (Dr Cooper), St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo. Dr Sclafani is now with the Departments of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, and New York Medical College, Valhalla.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dual-porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants for lip, nasolabial groove, and melolabial groove augmentation.
Verret et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006;8:423-425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modulation of Wound Response and Soft Tissue Ingrowth in Synthetic and Allogeneic Implants With Platelet Concentrate
Sclafani et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:163-169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Porous High-Density Polyethylene for Orbital Reconstruction
Lee et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:446-450.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immediate Autogenous Cartilage Grafts in Rhinoplasty After Alloplastic Implant Rejection
Raghavan et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:192-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Surgery on the Aging Neck With an Adjustable Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Cervical Sling
Prabhat and Dyer
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:491-501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modulation of Tissue Ingrowth Into Porous High-Density Polyethylene Implants With Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor and Autologous Blood Clot
Sabini et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:27-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) Augmentation of Deep Nasolabial Creases
Robertson and Dyer II
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:456-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.