You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 11, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Development of the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index

Michael S. Benninger, MD; Brent A. Senior, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(11):1175-1179.


Abstract

Assessment of patient perception of disability and outcomes from treatment has become an integral part of medical care. General quality-of-life measurement tools have led to the development of disease-specific quality instruments. Conventional methods for evaluating nasal-sinus disease are inadequate to assess the impact of these disorders on everyday life. Therefore, using methods that are well established and validated for creating instruments, the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index was created to evaluate the self-perceived impact of disease-specific head and neck disorders. The development of the preliminary and final versions (30 items) of the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index is described. Content-related validity using Cronbach's {alpha} measurement and construct-related validity were accomplished. A comparison of the responses between patients with and without documented nasal or sinus disease was used to verify that the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index is a valid measuring instrument for patients with sinus disease, and test-retest validity reveals reliability over time.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1175-1179



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Qualitative Aspects of Nasal Irrigation Use by Patients With Chronic Sinus Disease in a Multimethod Study
Rabago et al.
Ann Fam Med 2006;4:295-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Outcomes After Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Bhattacharyya
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:975-978.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of First-Line vs Second-Line Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Sinusitis
Piccirillo et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1849-1856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.